Ararume Drags Buhari to Court over Alleged Unlawful Removal as NNPC Chairman

Ararume Drags Buhari to Court over Alleged Unlawful Removal as NNPC Chairman

•Demands N100bn compensation

Alex Enumah in Abuja

Senator Ifeanyi Ararume yesterday commenced legal action challenging what he described as his unlawful removal as Non-executive Chairman of the newly Incorporated Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL).

Ararume in the suit filed before a Federal High Court, Abuja is also demanding a whopping sum of N100 billion compensation for damages suffered as a result of his unlawful removal.

Among the issues he raised for determination included whether in view of the provisions of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the NNPC, Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2010 and the Petroleum Industry Act, 2021 (PIA), the office of the non-executive Chairman was not governed and regulated by the stated provisions of the law.

The suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/691/2022 was instituted on his behalf by a group of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) comprising Chief Chris Uche, Ahmed Raji, Mahmud Magaji, Ogwu James Onoja, K.C Nwufor and Gordy Uche.

Amongst others, the plaintiff wants the court to determine whether by the interpretation of section 63 (3) of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, the President can lawfully remove him as non-executive Chairman of the NNPC for any reason outside the provisions of the law.

Besides, Ararume is praying the court to determine whether Buhari could sack him without compliance with expressly stated provisions of the Articles of Memorandum of Association of the Company, section 63 (3) of the PIA Act, 2021 and section 288 of the CAMA Act, 2020.

Also listed for determination was whether his purported removal vide letter of January 17, 2022, without compliance with expressly stated provisions of the law was not wrongful, illegal, null and void and of no legal consequence whatsoever.

Upon the determination of the issues in his favour, the plaintiff wants the court to make declaration that his position as non-executive Chairman of the NNPC was exclusively governed and regulated by CAMA 2020, PIA Act 2021 and Memorandum of Association of the Company.

“A declaration that by the provisions of section 63 (3) of the PIA Act, CAMA Act and Memorandum of Association of the NNPC, the President cannot by will remove him from office as non-executive Chairman without following due process of the law,” he urged.

Ararume therefore prayed for an order of the Court setting aside his removal by Buhari vide letter of January 17, 2022 with reference number SGF.3V111/86.

He also sought an order of the court reinstating him forthwith and restoring him to office with all the appurtenant rights and privileges of the office of the NNPC’s non-executive Chairman.

Plaintiff is further demanding for nullification and setting aside of all decisions and resolutions of the NNPC Board made in his absence from January 17, 2022, till date and another order restraining the defendants from removing his name as Director of the Company.

In a 75-paragraph affidavit in support of the suit, Ararume averred that upon the passage of the PIA 2021, the former Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries were unbundled to become Nigeria National Petroleum Company registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission with number 1843987.

That on October 20, 2021, Buhari approved his appointment as a non-executive Chairman for a period of initial five years and subsequently, his name registered in the Memorandum of Articles of the Company and the appointment announced to the whole world.

Based on the appointment, Ararume averred that he attended 23rd World Petroleum Congress in the United States of America but surprisingly on January 7th, 2022, Buhari, inaugurated the NNPC Board without a recourse to him while another person was named in his place.

By a letter of January 17, 2022, he was informed of withdrawal of his appointment but without any reason whatsoever to justify the purported removal.

Plaintiff asserted that he was not guilty of any pre- conditions for removal and was never declared bankruptcy or adjudged medically unfit for the job.

Based on the unlawful act of the defendant, plaintiff said that the action has fueled public suspicion and rumours against his person.

Subsequently, Ararume asserted that he had suffered loss of credibility and goodwill, untold emotional, mental and psychological trauma and public humiliation, degradation and embarrassment by his purported removal by President Buhari.

He therefore prayed the court to award him N100 billion compensation and to order his return to office in line with the letter and conditions of his appointment.

At Wednesday’s proceedings, Justice Inyang Edem Ekwo ordered that the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) be joined as a party following no objection from Chief Chris Uche who stood for Ararume and Alhasan. Shuaib who represented Buhari.

Justice Ekwo subsequently fixed December 15, for further mention into the suit and ordered that the amended originating summons be served on parties before the adjourned date.

Related Articles