NGO Sues Gombe District Head, Others for Depriving Women Inheritable Farms
FONPAA Urges Buhari to Assent to HND/BSc Dichotomy Act
Shops, Warehouses Razed in Lagos Early Morning Fire
Alleged Forgery: Appeal Court Refuses to Halt Obaseki’s Trial
By Alex Enumah
The Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal yesterday refused to halt the trial of Edo State Governor, Mr. Godwin Obaseki, over alleged certificate forgery at a Federal High Court in Abuja.
The three man panel presided by Stephen Adah, declined to grant the application for stay of proceedings brought by Obaseki on the grounds that the law does not permit granting of a stay in either pre-election or election matters.
The All Progressives Congress (APC) and one Williams Edobor, had dragged the governor before a Federal High Court, accusing him of forging his Bachelor of Arts Degree certificate he submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in aid of his qualification for the last governorship election in Edo State.
But Obaseki in an application had prayed the lower court to strike out certain paragraphs of the APC in their response to his reply. His prayer was not granted, forcing him to appeal the ruling of Justice Mohammed.
Following his appeal at the appellate court, Obaseki then applied to the Federal High Court to adjourn the matter indefinitely.
Ruling on the application on Tuesday, Justice Mohammed agreed with Obaseki’s lawyer that the proper thing to do once an appeal against a ruling has been confirmed at the Court of Appeal, is to halt further proceedings at the lower court.
According to him, “once a lower court is aware of an appeal at the Court of Appeal, it will be wrong to ignore such application and go ahead with the suit”.
“This suit is hereby adjourned sine die to await the decision of the Court of Appeal for the first defendant’s application for stay of further proceedings”, the judge held.
However, when the matter came up at the Court of Appeal yesterday, the appellate court disagreed with the position of Justice Mohammed, noting that section 258 of the Constitution does allow for a stay of proceedings in a pre-election or election matter.
The panel in their unanimous decision then ordered a return of the case to the trial judge, adding that trial should be on a day to day.
By the rule governing pre-election matters, a High Court has 180 days to hear and take a decision on a case, as anything done outside the 180 days becomes statute barred and a mere academic exercise.