Blame National Assembly,  not Buhari for Delayed Electoral Act, says APC Chieftain

…Current Electoral Act is a PDP inspired Legislation

By Nseobong Okon-Ekong

Mr.  Tonye Princewill,  former governorship aspirant in Rivers State and chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has faulted arguments by opponents of President Muhammadu Buhari that his commitment to signing the Electoral Act offers a better assurance for peace at the 2019 polls.

He insisted that insincerity of members of the federal legislature was responsible the delay in presidential approval to the amended electoral law.
Princewill gave reasons for his position.  “Thanks to the selfish interest of the National Assembly leaders who wanted to alter the order of elections and hold the executive to ransom. This bill has gone through multiple attempts that need not have been. Four years wasted. This final version not only falls short, it comes too late for any positive impact to come out of it. A new change now, to the electoral act, this close to an election, is not only irresponsible but incompetent. It is also ill-advised. That is not me talking, those are the conclusions reached by multiple international bodies who all state that election rules should not be changed within six months of an election. Common sense would have dictated that they work out the way forward in partnership with the executive. The current electoral act is a PDP inspired legislation, signed into law by a PDP President and it was used to remove them. So it works.”
The APC chieftain also countered the prevailing notion that the recent peace accord signed by presidential candidates of various political parties does not necessarily guarantee they would keep the peace, saying that the accord does not address the fundamental issue of apportioning consequences for violating the peace.

Expressing  a different view, he said “I don’t believe that the purpose of the accord is to guarantee peace, more to encourage it. I don’t think this goes far enough. I am a firm believer in being, not just tough on the problem, but also tough on the causes of the problem. Being tough on the problem means unless there are consequences for violating the peace, the peace will always continue to be violated. I didn’t see tough consequences in the recent peace accord.”
Referencing his experience as a governorship candidate in Rivers State,  Princewill said a similar peace accord did not stem the tide of violence.  According to him,  “In 2015, three candidates (of which I was one) signed a peace accord in Rivers state, yet it was the most violent election ever. Where there any consequences? No. The US government, the U.K. government and the EU championed that process in company of a few statesmen. It had no teeth. I can think of several ways to put teeth in the accord, but those who should are not willing. We will continue to see these ceremonies once every four years.”
Justifying his stance,  he said,  “Being tough on the causes, means dealing with issues which have forever plagued this country. Namely, corruption, a lack of basic education, promoting internal party democracy,  small arms proliferation and youth unemployment. That responsibility rests with governments at federal and at state level. No foreign government can fix that problem for us. However Nigerians are some of the most adaptable humans on earth. Show them a deterrent and give them options and you will need no signing of peace accords.”