Electoral Amendment Bill 2018: Three Political Parties Ask Court to Stop Presidential Assent

Segun James

Three political parties yesterday approached the Federal High Court in Abuja seeking an order of the court to stop President Muhammadu Buhari from assenting to the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2018.

The three political parties are Advanced Peoples Democratic Alliance (APDA), Allied Peoples Movement (APM) and Movement for Restoration and Defence of Democracy, (MRDD).

They also want a declaration of the court that assenting that the bill would truncate the 2019 general election.

Counsel to the plaintiff, Mr. Dapo Otitoju, who filed the process on behalf of his clients told journalists that they had two questions for the court to determine.

“Whether the president can proceed to asset the Electoral Act amendment bill 2018 forwarded to him by the National Assembly to be used to conduct the 2019 general election when there is no adequate time for the manifestation of the proposed act.

“Also, whether assenting to the Electoral Amendment Bill 2018 now will not prevent the chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from ensuring proper conduct of the 2019 general election,” the stated.

This, according to the plaintiffs, is considering the fact that the notice of election was initiated in line with the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.

In an affidavit in support of the originating summons, presidential candidate of APDA, Mr. Shitu Kabir, deposed that act had been used by political parties to conduct primaries into political elective offices for 2019.

Kabir further deposed that amending the act that had been used for primary elections in preparation for the 2019 general election would engender confusion in the electoral process.

According to him, assenting the bill will truncate the electoral process which has already begun.

“I know as a fact that the bill will provide for electronic transmission of results from polling unit to collation centres.

“I know that there is no way the electorate who are not educated in this area can assimilate the act of electoral voting and transmission in less than two months to the general elections.

“As a candidate, I know as a fact that the level of education of the generality of the electorate is very low and they will be confused, and this may lead to disenfranchisement.

“That proper voters’ education and demonstration of electronic voting system is required to be done in all 36 states of the federation, the FCT and the 774 local government areas before such a bill can be introduced to the electoral process,” he noted.

The plaintiffs, however, said they were not against the bill or the president giving his assent.

They maintained that they were only asking that assent to the bill should be withheld until after the 2019 elections to avoid manipulation of the process.

The suit which also has the Senate president, the Speaker, House of Representatives, the INEC chairman and the Attorney-General of the Federation as defendants has however not been assigned to a judge.

Related Articles