The Supreme Court wednesday fixed March 2 for judgment on an appeal by former National Security Adviser (NSA) Sambo Dasuki, challenging his alleged indefinite detention.
The panel of five Justices, led by Dattijo Mohammed, gave the date after counsel to the parties in the case adopted their addresses.
The ex-NSA had on June 15, 2016 at the Court of Appeal in Abuja, lost his bid to enforce his freedom after securing bails on all the charges against him.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalled that Dasuki is standing trial for allegedly mismanaging $2.1 billion meant for purchase of arms to fight the Boko Haram insurgents.
Dasukiâ€™s counsel, Joe Daudu, argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal was erroneous, adding that it was incumbent on the Supreme Court to restore the integrity of Daudu submitted that it was out of place for the court of appeal to scuttle the fundamental rights of a citizen after well-considered decisions of four courts that admitted the applicant to bail.
He said that his client needed the bail to prepare his defence, adding that he could not have access to security documents while in detention.
â€œMy Lords, Dasuki is already being treated as a convict, even when none of the charges brought against him has been concluded.
â€œWe sincerely pray this esteemed court to do the needful by setting aside the decision of the lower court.
â€œWe also pray the court to momentarily halt the applicantâ€™s trial until the federal government obeys the bail order of court,â€™â€™ Daudu said.
Rotimi Jacobs, counsel to EFCC, opposed the appeal, saying that it lacked merit and should be dismissed.
He said the bail condition granted Mr. Dasuki was perfected on December 29, 2015, adding that a warrant of release to that effect was served on the Comptroller of Prisons in Kuje, upon which he was released.
Mr. Jacobs said the federal government had not violated his rights, adding that the applicant was only re-arrested by the operatives of the SSS over other fraud allegations.
He said that it was unfair for the applicant to consider his re-arrest as a disobedience to courtâ€™s order on his bail.
He said that no court bail was targeted at the SSS when granted.
â€œThe EFCC which put Dasuki on trial on criminal charges at the FCT High Court cannot be held responsible for the action of the DSS on the ground that the two agencies are different entities.
â€œBesides, My Lords, the appeal court has said there was no existing order against the re-arrest of Dasuki.
â€œSuffice to say that there cannot be a disobedience to a non-existing court order.
â€œWe pray the apex court to affirm the decision of the lower court which ordered the continuation of the applicantâ€™s trial even while he remains in detention,â€™â€™ he said.
Dasuki had approached Supreme Court praying it to set aside the decision of the Court of Appeal which exonerated EFCC from his re-arrest shortly after he perfected his bail conditions.
He further asked the court to void the ruling of the Federal High Court.
The trial court had held that DSS and EFCC were distinct agents of the federal government, which is the complainant in the charges against the applicant.
Dasuki had alleged that such pronouncement had given the two agents of government handling the trial to act at variance and against justice.