Alex Enumah in Abuja
The trial of a former Chief of Administration, Nigerian Air Force (NAF) headquarters, Air Vice Marshal Mohammed Alkali Mamu (Rtd), resumed on Monday with the accused entering the witness box to testify in his own trial.
Mamu, who is standing trial on a four count amended charges of corruption and bribery preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), told the trial judged, Justice Salisu Garba of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) that he was tutored and teleguided in making his statement by the EFCC.
At the resumed trail yesterday, the Rtd Air Vice Marshall, while been led in evidence by his counsel, Chief Joseph Daudu, SAN, narrated how the EFCC suppressed part of his statement andÂ also threatened to call his two daughters should he failed to refund back the money he is being accused of collecting as bribe.
He said despite been accompanied to the EFCC’s office
According to him, his request that hisÂ lawyers be present during his interrogation and his subsequent writing of his statement was turned down on the grounds that all they were after was the recovery of funds.
He said, though he was accompanied to the EFCC’s office by one Commander Sunday Jigawa who was at that time NAF Deputy Director, yet the operatives refused to allow him be by his side.
“The first statement I wrote is not before this court. The additional statement marked n1 and n4 obtained from St1 was removed from the statement I made.
” Again I noticed that the supporting documents I submitted both in st1 and St 2 are not before this court” he said.
Evidences of transactions he had with Hima Abubakar of Societe Dâ€™Equipments Internationaux Nigeria Limited (the company EFCC allegedÂ he received the bribe from) were presented and tendered as exhibit.
While insisting that he was innocent of the charges brought against him by the EFCC, the defendant prayed the court to discharge and acquit him of all the four charges.
Mamu, who told the court that his vehicles impounded by the EFCC are still in the custody of the anti-graft agency, therefore, prayed the court for an order to return the vehicles and or replaced themÂ if they were found to be in a bad shape.
He further prayed the court to compel the EFCC operatives to return the sum of $300,000 and N5.9million they obtained from him.
Meanwhile, the prosecuting counsel, Sylvanus TahirÂ who had vehemently opposed the tendering of the 2nd document said, the documents were never part of the proceedings.
He said that the document sought to be tendered which is a letter to the Attorney General of the Federation was not addressed to the EFCC.
Tahir, wondered why a document addressed to the AGF will be tendered to a different agency of government and added that they are gross violation of Section102,103 and 104 of the Evidence Act and therefore cannot be admissible.
At the end of his evidence, Justice Garba adjourned to 13 and 14 December for ruling on the objections of prosecution counsel to the admissibility of some of the documents and for cross examination by the prosecution.
Marshal Mohammed Alkali Mamu is facing a four count charge of bribery preferred against him by the EFCC.
He is been accused of receiving the sums of $300,000 and N5.9m from one Hima Abubakar of Societe Dâ€™Equipments Internationaux Nigeria Limited.
But he claimed that the funds were for covert operations in combating the war against Boko Haram.
â€œI was in Ukraine when this covert and sensitive military assignment was given to one Hima Abubakar of Societe Dâ€™Equipments Internationaux Nigeria Limited (the company EFCC said he received the bribe from) by the NSA. Abubakar identified three mercenary fighter pilots, soldiers of fortune and veterans of many wars who were willing to take up this job,â€ he said.
He said he was ordered by the Chief of Air Staff to liaise with Abubakar to facilitate the medical examination and process entry visas into Nigeria for the three Ukrainian mercenary pilots that were coming to fly the MI35P helicopters.
He added that due to the undercover nature of the assignments, transactions and documentations were mainly â€œin pseudo or disguised form, including monies and properties which form part of this charge against me.â€