34 Federal High Court Judges Nominated for Appointment Fail Integrity Test 

Alex Enumah in Abuja 

A total of 34 lawyers nominated for appointment as judges of the Federal High Court of Nigeria (FHC) have been discovered to lack the necessary integrity required to sit on the bench of the Nigerian judiciary.

This was revealed in a report by the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC), which carried an integrity test on 62 lawyers recently shortlisted for appointment as judges of the FHC.

According to a source at the FJSC, the 62 lawyers had some months ago emerged successful in a CBT exam conducted by the FHC, following which their names were forwarded to the commission for further screening and interview by the National Judicial Council (NJC).

The source added that in line with the new policy of the NJC under the leadership of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, to ensure only credible, competent and persons of integrity were appointed as judicial officers, the names of the nominees were brought under public scrutiny.

“Members of the public were invited to submit feedback on nominees’ integrity, reputation and suitability for appointment as judicial officers,” the source explained, adding that the invitation was contained in a publication made on September 17, 2025.

Response by members of the public, which was considered encouraging, has however led to the dropping of 34 nominees found to be unsuitable for appointment as judges of the FHC.

In one of the petitions dated September 22 but received on September 23, by the Executive Secretary of the FJSC, one of the nominees, a public officer from Imo State, was accused of having”zero reputation,” due to “her love for taking bribe”.

The petitioner, who claimed to be a victim of illegal demolition of his property in Abuja, alleged that he was not only arrested by the police over the demolition of his property but was forced to part with the sum of N1 million before he was released on bail.

While urging the FJSC to refuse her nomination, the petitioner claimed that the character of the nominee “clearly is one that can best be described as person who clearly lacks integrity, total failure in terms of measurement of reputation and above all highly unsuitable to be appointed as a judge of the Federal High Court of Nigeria”. 

He added that: “The judiciary has had its own backlash in the sight of the public but we are grateful for the leadership of the judiciary for taking bold steps in sanitizing the judicial system.”

When contacted, the Director, Information, NJC, Mrs Kemi Ogedengbe, who refused to comment on the lack of integrity of majority of the nominees, however, noted that the council is expected to meet between January 13 and 14 to consider those shortlisted for appointment by the FJSC.

She added that the 28 shortlisted nominees will further face an interview panel of the council to fully ascertain their suitability, adding that the NJC is fully determined not to lower the entry point bar for appointment irrespective of who is involved. 

“You are all aware, like the general public too, that transparency and judicial integrity have remained a top priority for the Kekere-Ekun-led administration. There is no going back on that. Merit is the only factor that would come to play during the interview and only those found suitable would have their ways,” Ogedengbe said.