Now hereâ€™s a question that demands an answer. Why is it that arguably the worldâ€™s richest continent â€“ in terms of natural resources â€“ has some of the worldâ€™s poorest people? To answer it, weâ€™d need to take a trip down memory lane. Already I can sense you rolling your eyes deep into the back of your head. â€œIf I hear one more time about slavery in Africa â€¦â€
We often seem to be a people with little patience for history or interest in the impact of past events on present realities. But time isnâ€™t linear and we arenâ€™t always moving forward. There is no other way to understand Africa today without considering the history of the continent.
In the 1400s the Portuguese were the first European nation to use African slave labour to cultivate sugar plantations off the coast of West Africa, in SÃ£o TomÃ©. From then on, through its peak in the 18th century and until its staccato abolition in late 1800s, the barbaric and dehumanising trade in Africans would be the primary economic activity through which Europeâ€™s early globalisation efforts were funded.
An estimated 11 million people were forcibly taken into slavery in the New World, but comparable numbers were for centuries also sold across the Sahara, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. The professor of economics, Nathan Nunn, in his study of Africaâ€™s slave trades on subsequent economic development, was unequivocal in his assessment: â€œThe African countries that are the poorest today are the ones from which the most slaves were taken,â€ he wrote in the Quarterly Journal of Economics.
The sordid story doesnâ€™t end there. The enslavement of the black body made way for another equally brutal system, but one that elicits even less public sympathy. In 2002, our now foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, wrote of Britainâ€™s colonial legacy in Africa: â€œThe continent may be a blot, but it is not a blot upon our conscience. The problem is not that we were once in charge, but that we are not in charge any more.â€ In 2016, 44% of respondents in a YouGov poll agreed with him, stating that Britainâ€™s colonial history was â€œsomething to be proud ofâ€.
Because this system of oppression, based on greed and white supremacy, was not a lived experience for the inhabitants of this fair isle â€“ as segregation in the US was, for example â€“ and because it is still not taught in our schools, we delude ourselves into believing that empire was a noble cause, and we are charmed by the promises politicians make to take us back to the good old days. What period exactly are we trying to get back to?
All of Africaâ€™s colonial masters left behind a way of life completely decimated, a people traumatised and taught in colonial schools to loathe everything about themselves: their skin, their languages, their dress, their customs. Even their gods were replaced. As the psychoanalyst and revolutionary writer Frantz Fanon put it this way in his 1961 book, The Wretched of the Earth: â€œColonialism is not satisfied merely with holding a people in its grip and emptying the nativeâ€™s brain of all form and content. By a kind of perverted logic, it turns to the past of the oppressed people, and distorts, disfigures, and destroys it.â€
So a people seemingly with no past were now free to determine their own future. Except, in most â€“ if not all â€“ cases, they werenâ€™t. Postcolonial Africa was caught in the middle of the cold war battle for ideological dominance, then crippled by structural adjustment policies of the World Bank and IMF and is now at the mercy of multinational corporations whose bank balances (many times the size of many African economies) give them power to act in ways that are, if not always above the law, certainly outside of the moral maze.
In May, a report into resource flows in and out of Africa revealed that the continent loses more money each year than it receives in aid, investment and remittances. According to Honest Accounts 2017 more than three times the amount Africa receives in aid was taken out mainly by multinational companies deliberately misreporting the value of their imports or exports to reduce tax. Along with these illicit financial flows, brain drain, debt servicing, and the costs of climate change â€“ caused predominantly by the west but played out on the worldâ€™s poorest people â€“ all make Africa a net creditor to the world.
These examples speak to the way in which the global economic, trade and information systems are set up, and screw over African countries: from unfair intellectual property laws, to trade deals that force African countries to open up their markets to the rich worldâ€™s surplus production, destroying local agriculture and manufacturing in the process. But this shouldnâ€™t be read as a get-out-of-jail-free card for African leaders.
In the half-century since independence, while economies have grown and, in the broadest sense, governance has improved, democracy on the continent is still faltering. The lack of transparency, accountability, safety and the rule of law; the often bloated public sectors and squeezed small businesses; patriarchy masquerading as religion and culture; high unemployment rates and, recently, jihadism destabilising the Sahel region â€“ all these factors are keeping Africans poor.
But of course, that statement is a sweeping generalisation â€“ the kind you have to make when writing about 54 countries in 1,000 words. That every day millions of internet users are seeking to understand a continent rather than a specific country or a region is itself telling. The question about why Africa is so poor is loaded with bias, and presumes two things: the first is that thereâ€™s a homogeneous place called Africa, and that Googleâ€™s search algorithm will find some pithy yet succinct quote to explain 54 distinctive trajectories.
The second assumption is that there is something exceptional about Africa, that while other continents and peoples have got or are getting richer, Africans, for reasons we can think but no longer speak in polite company, choose to remain in poverty. Our capacity to see Africa as divergent lets us off the hook so we donâ€™t have to understand our own complicity in the challenges various African countries face today. It also means we rarely rage, as we should against the actions of the corporations and governments that profit from instability, corruption or even inexperience (African negotiators at the climate talks have historically been disadvantaged by their lack of experience and the expectation among western negotiators that they should be grateful with whatever they get).
If there is, then, no innate propensity for corruption, violence or poverty in Africa, then the narratives that fuel the stereotypes need questioning. One possible explanation comes from the Nigerian author Chinua Achebe, who said: â€œThe West seems to suffer deep anxieties about the precariousness of its civilisation and to have a need for constant reassurance by comparison with Africa.â€ Perhaps itâ€™s not Africa that needs saving, but us.
â€¢ Culled from The Guardian, UK