Latest Headlines
How Dipo Fasawe Turns Global Rollouts into Predictable Results
By Ugo Aliogo
Oladipupo “Dipo” Fasawe is best known inside large organizations for making big, multi-region rollouts feel calm. He won’t discuss confidential program details or internal team names; the company he worked with values discretion. What he does share is the operating craft behind the outcomes—how he took a new selling approach from concept to standard practice for more than ten thousand customer-facing employees across three regions without the usual chaos.
Fasawe began by defining how work would move. He set a short, reliable cadence of cross-functional syncs focused on decisions and blockers, paired with an executive forum for trade-offs and escalations. He introduced concise templates that standardized status updates and forced teams to surface aging items and interdependencies early. With the rhythm in place, decisions sped up, surprises fell, and progress became measurable week over week.
He also stood up the operating framework for a small standards-and-quality group—clarifying mission and roles for a seven-person team, instituting a monthly budget rhythm that consistently hit targets, and running quarterly objective reviews that linked output to outcomes. The point wasn’t bureaucracy; it was creating a repeatable way for a compact team to protect quality at scale.
A major choke point was specialist capacity—visual designers and learning experts who turn ideas into usable tools. Requests had been ad hoc and perpetually “urgent.” Fasawe replaced that pattern with a clear intake process, sizing guidelines, and a capacity planning model that treated specialist hours like scheduled resources. Once stable, he transitioned the model to program management so it would outlast the initial push. The visible effects were straightforward: fewer expedites, cleaner reviews, and steadier output—all without proportional headcount growth.
Planning moved from aspiration to options when he introduced a scenario-based model for the upcoming year. Leaders could test fast, steady, or constrained paths and see the real resource implications of each. Supporting two teams of roughly fifty people, the model optimized allocation by about twenty percent, freeing capacity for priority initiatives and reducing mid-quarter churn.
Fasawe also addressed the drag of a legacy training catalog. Rather than letting old assets slow search and reuse, he implemented a maintenance plan and digital tagging strategy so content became findable, recombinable, and refreshable on a defined cadence. New builds didn’t drown in old materials; the installed base became an asset again.
Underneath it all was a bias for standard work that protects speed and quality: concise briefs, clear acceptance criteria, and short decision logs that ended the meeting-about-the-meeting cycle. He kept the metric list deliberately short—plan adherence, capacity utilization, cycle time, and on-time delivery to target audiences—so movement triggered action, not just reporting.
The outcome, stated without revealing sensitive internals, was a rollout that landed on schedule, reached the audiences it needed to reach, and continued to improve after the first wave. Throughput rose without proportional hiring. Cycle times shortened because rework fell. And the organization retained the cadence, capacity model, scenario planning, and catalog discipline as durable infrastructure for the next initiative.
That is Dipo Fasawe’s hallmark: turning ambitious, multi-region programs into reliable systems while keeping the spotlight on the work—not the headlines. He leaves behind more than a launch; he leaves an operating backbone that keeps its promises







