THE ALTERNATIVE
By Reno Omokri
It is often said that if you want to hide anything from our people, all you need to do is put it in writing. The people who said it are not racists, although I used to think so. They are factual people, who understand the behaviour of the Sub-Saharan African. You see, our people hate to read. You write about their history and they will say ‘na who go read all this long thing’? You dey craze?’ And in their minds, you are foolish for writing, while they are wise for not being fooled into reading ‘the nonsense’ that you wrote. Anything longer than a few sentences is nonsense to them). Am I lying?
If we do not change that behaviour, we will never make meaningful progress, even if we elect the best leaders. Why? Because a leader can only lead a willing people to the stream, but cannot force them to drink from the stream.
One of the most fallacious arguments I have encountered is the premise that Africans should reject Christianity, because it is a European religion. This is really a function of ignorance. But let us not take my word for it. Let us look into Scripture.
Judaism, Christianity and Islam are often called Abrahamic religions. But in truth, Abraham is the father of the Israelites. However, Judaism originated with Moses.
Moses left Mizraim (the word Egypt does not exist in Scripture. The place now called Egypt is referred to as Mizraim) and went to leave with Black Africans in a place called Midian.
While there, he was accommodated by the Black African priest of Midian named Reuel, who gave Moses his daughter, Zipporah, as his wife-Exodus 2:21.
This man became Moses’s mentor and taught him much of what he knew about God. In fact, Scripture says:
“Moses listened to his father-in-law and did everything he said.”-Exodus 18:24.
If you look at the laws that Moses taught the children of Israel, you will notice that they are similar to your own Black African tribal laws that existed long before our contact with Europeans.
Deuteronomy 25:5 is an example:
“If brothers are living together and one of them dies without a son, his widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband’s brother shall take her and marry her and fulfil the duty of a brother-in-law to her.”
This custom is an ancient African custom that has been practiced amongst the Edekiri (the real name of the language wrongly called Yoruba by Bishop Samuel Ajayi Crowther). If you ask an Olukunmi (alternate name for the people wrongly called Yoruba) elder, he will tell you that this practice has been customary for Omoluabi, as well as other Edekiri people from the Igala to the Itsekiri.
As a matter of fact, pre-colonially, the most widely used name for the people now in the Southwest of Nigeria, was not Yoruba. Their language is Edekiri, but the people referred to themselves as Omoluabi, which is a word that evolved from omo-ti-olu-iwa-bi, meaning the child that the lord of character begat.
Many people, including a good number of modern-day ‘Yoruba’ intellectuals, believe that Oluwa means Lord. No it does not. Oluwa connotes Lord, but it does not mean lord. It is actually a compound world, Olu Iwa, which means Lord of Iwa, meaning character, or good morals.
Olu-Iwa is believed in Yoruba mythology to be the scriptural Noah.
Another example is Leviticus chapter 4, which prescribes animal sacrifices for sin.
“If the anointed priest sins, bringing guilt on the people, he must bring to the Lord, a young bull without defect as a sin offering”-Leviticus 4:3.
“The assembly must bring a young bull as a sin offering and present it before the tent of meeting.”-Leviticus 4:14.
This is a common pre-colonial practice amongst many African ethnicities, but more especially with the people now known as Yoruba, who still practice it till today.
Almost every sin, if not every sin, was purged by the Omoluabi with animal sacrifices. This is too widely known for me to even try to convince anyone. Watch Nollywood movies!
Another common customary practice of the Omoluabi that we see in Scripture is the practice of prostrating to elders and persons in authority, which the people now called Yoruba refer to as dobale, which literally means bow down low or to the ground.
The practice of dobale is almost as unique to the people referred to as Yoruba as is say, the Talking Drum.
And you see it in Scripture. Let us examine some Scripture:
“Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby. When he saw them, he hurried from the entrance of his tent to meet them and BOWED LOW to the GROUND.”-Genesis 18:2.
“Then she fell on her face, BOWING TO THE GROUND and said to him, “Why have I found favor in your sight that you should take notice of me, since I am a foreigner.”-Ruth 2:10.
“When Abigail saw David, she quickly got off her donkey and BOWED DOWN before David with her face to the ground.”-1 Samuel 25:23.
“Then Bathsheba BOWED DOWN with her face to the ground, prostrating herself before the king, and said, “May my lord King David live forever!”-1 Kings 1:31.
Two men were central to introducing cultural and religious practices to the ancient Hebrews. They were Abraham and Moses. And they have something in common. They both lived in Africa.
Abraham sojourned in Africa with his wife. We see this in Genesis 12:10:
“Now there was a famine in the land, and Abram went down to Egypt to live there for a while because the famine was severe.”
Moses was born and brought up in Africa. We see this in Exodus 2:3 and Exodus 2:10:
“Then she placed the child in it and put it among the reeds along the bank of the Nile.”
“When the child grew older, she took him to Pharaoh’s daughter and he became her son.”
Now, please ignore the word Egypt. It is a word that does NOT exist in the original Scripture. European translators inserted it there for reasons best known to them.
The question you should be asking is who are the people that lived in Mizraim, the land that is now referred to as Egypt.
Psalm 78:51 gives us a clue. That verse reads:
“He struck down all the firstborn of Egypt, the firstfruits of manhood in the tents of Ham.”
Notice that the ‘Egyptians’ were people of the ‘tents of Ham.’
Now, who is this Ham?
We see his origins in Genesis 5:32:
“After Noah was 500 years old, he became the father of Shem, HAM and Japheth.”
Ham was Noah’s son.
Now, pause for a minute and ask yourself what name do the Yoruba call themselves.
They refer to themselves, internally, as Omoluabi, which is a short form of Omo-ti-olu-iwa-bi, meaning the child that the lord of character begat.
Now, who do the Yoruba say that this Olu-Iwa is? Noah!
Now, who does Scripture say gave birth to Ham? Noah!
And for those who may doubt these dots I am connecting, ask yourself what the name of Ham’s first son was?
Genesis 10:6 says “The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.”
Ham’s first son was Cush. What does Cush mean in Hebrew? Cush simply means Black! Do not take my word for it. Google the meaning. Research it.
The meaning of the name of his second son (Mizraim) is Egypt. In fact, if you read that verse (Genesis 10:6) in the New International Version, and the English Standard Version, the name Mizraim is rendered as Egypt. Go ahead, read it.
And what was the name of Cush’s first son?
You see it in Genesis 10:8:
“Cush was the father of Nimrod.”
Now, that name Nimrod is a bastardisation. His real name is Namrud in Aramaic and Arabic. From where the European translators of Scripture into English got the name Nimrod, I would not know. But the name found in the Pentateuch is Namrud. Do not take my word for it. Google it. Or go to a reference library.
Long before they had contact with Arabs or Europeans, the people now referred to as Yoruba had an oral history of their origins, which they traced to Odùduwà (also known as Oòdua) who they cite as the son of Lamurudu, a priest/King from the Middle East.
The Hebrews and Arabs call him Namrud and the Yoruba have Lamurudu. Could this be a coincidence? Not at all. In Yoruba, the words N and L are interchangeable.
For example, some Yoruba people pronounce Limota as Nimota. And others say ki ni owi (what did you say?), while others say ki’lo wi, meaning the same thing. So, Lamurudu could as well be pronounced Namurudu. Now, what is the difference between Namurudu and Namrud?
So, it is not a coincidence that many of the practices you see in the Old Testament seem similar to Yoruba customs. Because the men, through whom God introduced these customs, i.e. Abraham and Moses lived with the ‘tents of Ham’ in modern-day Egypt.
When I see people bearing Moses, I feel sorry for them. The name Moses does not appear in Scripture. It is a made-up name, just like the name Jesus. The actual name in Scripture is Moshe. And the actual name for our Lord and Saviour is Yeshua.
The name Moshe is of Mizraim (Egyptian origin).
I am going to quote Exodus 2:10 from the Hebrew Bible translated directly into English:
“And the boy grew, and she brought him to the daughter of Pharaoh and he was a son to her, and she called his name Moshe (aka Moses), because she said, “I took him from the waters.”
If you go to Israel, they don’t bear Moses. They bear Moshe. For instance, the famous Israeli Minister of Defence was named Moshe Dayan.
That name Moshe, as you just read in Exodus 2:10 means “I took him from the waters.” Now, ask yourself what is the Yoruba (Edekiri) word for picking up something. It is Mo shá. That name Moshe is virtually indistinguishable from Mo shá, or Mosha.
The people in present-day Egypt are not the original inhabitants of Egypt. They are Arabs, who came to Egypt after the Muslim conquest of Egypt (between 641 AD and 654 AD). Again, please don’t take my word for it. Research it.
The original inhabitants of Mizraim (ancient Egypt), were conquered by Nebuchadnezzar and scattered from their land deeper into Africa. We see this in Jeremiah 46:2:
“Concerning Egypt: This is the message against the army of Pharaoh Necho king of Egypt, which was defeated at Carchemish on the Euphrates River by Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon in the fourth year of Jehoiakim son of Josiah king of Judah.”
And also in Jeremiah 46:13:
“This is the message the LORD spoke to Jeremiah the prophet about the coming of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon to attack Egypt:”
And how do we know that they went deeper into Africa? Well, it is common sense really. Nebuchadnezzar came from Babylon to the East of modern-day Egypt. Therefore, they could not have escaped to the East, as that would have put them right in front of Nebuchadnezzar’s army, and or the kingdoms of Judah and Israel, and the Edomites.
They could not escape to the North, because of the natural obstacle of the Mediterranean Sea.
Which means that the only option they would have had was to escape westward, towards modern-day Sudan and West Africa, or southwards, towards modern-day Ethiopia.
And since the people of modern-day Ethiopia have probably been in that geographical location for over 3000 years, by a process of elimination, it means the best likelihood is that they escaped westward into West Africa.
It seems incredulous to you? Are you even aware that the original name for the place now called Jerusalem is actually Jebus?
It is right there in Joshua 18:28:
“Zelah, Eleph, Jebus (which is Jerusalem), Gibeath, and Kirjath: fourteen cities with their villages. This was the inheritance of the children of Benjamin according to their families.”
Who are those Jebus?
The name Jebus that you read about in The Bible, refers to a tribe now known as Ijebu in Southwest Nigeria.
I have just blown your mind. I know. It sounds like blasphemy. Heresy. But please let me land!
The Ijebu do not call themselves I-J-E-B-U, the way you, an outsider, would pronounce all syllables. They call themselves J-E-B-U, with the I before jebu silent.
In the King James Version, the town is known as Jebus. You see that in 1 Chronicles 11:5:
“And the inhabitants of Jebus said to David, Thou shalt not come hither. Nevertheless David took the castle of Zion, which is the city of David.”
While the people of Jebus are referred to a Jebusites. We see this in Genesis 10:16:
“the Jebusite, the Amorite, and the Girgashite.”
Basically, what the European translators did is just to confuse you by adding ite to the name of a kingdom, in order to describe the people of the kingdom. So, for example, if Kano, or Benin, or Monaco, were to have been mentioned in the KJV, the people would have been Kanites, Benites, and Monacites.
In fact, the method by which the ancient Israelites consulted God, called divination, is almost identical to the Yoruba method of divination, known as Odu Ifá.
When people hear of Odu Ifá, used by the Ijebu, and borrowed by their Yoruba neighbours (Ijebu and Yoruba are different ethnicities), they immediately think it is witchcraft or sorcery. Nothing like that. Odu Ifá is simply divination by casting lots. A practice that was used in both the Old and New Testaments of Scripture-John 19:24, Acts 1:26, Leviticus 16:8.
Now, I am not asking you to start practicing the divination aspect of Odu Ifá. Deuteronomy 18:9-10 preached against the practice of divination to any god except the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. And I do not know to whom the Odu Ifá diviners consult, and I do not want to mislead people. However, I accept the scientific aspects of our culture.
The simplest way to summarise what Odu Ifá is, is to say that it is just pattern recognition of a series of binary codes. Many people of Yoruba origin, both literate and illiterate, find themselves particularly gifted in mathematics. It is an evolutionary trait inbuilt in them from millennia of Ifá divination by their ancestors.
I could go on and on, but my editor does not like it when I write beyond 2000 words (he believes modern man has a short attention span). But let me just say that there is science in African culture, like the Ifa Yoruba divination. We should not reject our own culture as barbaric, devilish and fetish, while adopting wholesale Western cultures, such as Christmas, Easter, Trinity, purgatory, etc, that are based on paganism. Africans, let’s not be culture vultures!
