Falana Faults Judges for Imposing N10m Fines on Litigants over Lack of Locus Standi

0
Femi Falana

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr. Femi Falana, has faulted High Court judges for imposing fines ranging from N5m to N10m on litigants whose cases were struck out for want of locus standi.

In a statement on Monday, the senior lawyer who described such fines as “renewed attack on public interest litigation by judges”, argued that such cannot be justified under the Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act. 
Citing the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 which  enjoined judges to encourage public interest litigation in promoting the human rights of Nigerians, he argued that the doctrine of locus standi had been abolished in the area of human rights by Order III of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009.
The statement read:
“In recent time, some High Court Judges have been reported to have imposed fines ranging from N5 million to N10 million on concerned citizens whose cases were struck out for want of locus standi. With respect, the renewed attack on public interest litigation by judges cannot be justified under the Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act. “
“Specifically, the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 have  enjoined judges to encourage public interest litigation in promoting the human rights of Nigerian people. Ex abundanti cautela, the doctrine of locus standi has been abolished in the area of human rights by Order III of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009. Since access to court has been guaranteed by sections 6 and 36 of the 1999 Constitution and article 7 of the African Charter on Hunan and Peoples Rights Act it is illegal and unconstitutional to impose fines on aggrieved citizens who approach the courts to challenge the illegal official policies or unconstitutuonal legislations under the current democratic dispensation.  
“As far as the law stands no judge has the power to order a litigant to pay costs outside the ambit of  the Rules of the respective High Courts. Even in the award of costs litigants and their counsel are given fair hearing by judges. Why then are fines imposed on litigants or lawyers  without allowing them to make any representation? 
“I wish to state that no judge is empowered by the Constitution, High Court Law or Rules of Court to impose fines of N5 million or N10 million on a litigant who has not been tried and convicted for committing a criminal offence in Nigeria. 
“We  are therefore compelled to draw the attention of our judges to the case of Fawehinmi v Akilu (1997) NWLR (Pt 65) 979 wherein the Supreme Court overruled the  case of Abraham Adesanya v The President (1981) ANLR 1. Since the anachronistic doctrine has been set aside to pave way for public interest litigation our judges should desist from striking out or dismissing cases which are filed to challenge impunity of public officers in Nigeria.”