Outrage over Masari’s Alleged Approval of N499.6m for Buhari’s Visit to Katsina

Outrage over Masari’s Alleged Approval of N499.6m for Buhari’s Visit to Katsina

•It’s corruption, says CSOs 

•No such approval, commissioner denies

Francis Sardauna in Katsina

Governor Aminu Bello Masari of Katsina State yesterday came under heavy criticism for allegedly approving N499.6 million for the mobilisation of citizens to welcome President Muhammadu Buhari visit to the state.

Buhari, who hails from Daura Local Government Area of the state, is expected in the state on a two-day official visit from January 26 to 27, 2023, to inaugurate some projects executed by the state government.

A leaked letter dated January 18, 2023, conveying the approval for the release of the funds which had gone viral on social media, showed that the governor made the approval for the release of the money.

According to the letter signed by Yahuza S. Ibrahim on behalf of the Permanent Secretary, Government House, and addressed to the Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Hon. Ya’u Umar Gwajo-Gwajo, the money was expected to be sourced from the Local Government Joint Account.

It read: “I am directed to refer to your letter No. S/MLGCA/GEN/259/C/IV of 17th January, 2023 and to convey the approval of His Excellency, the Governor for the release of N14,695,588.00 to each of the 34 LGCs totalling N499,650,000.00 (Four Hundred and Ninety Nine Million, Six Hundred and Fifty Thousand Naira Only).

“From the available balance of the 34 LGCs in the Local Government Joint Account to enable the LGCs to cater for adequate and effective mobilization of citizens to receive Mr. President during an official visit to Katsina State from 26th -27th January, 2023.

“Attached herewith is a photocopy of the approval for your guidance. This letter is copied to the Accountant General, Ministry of Finance and Auditor General for Local Government for awareness, please.”

Reacting to the development, the state Coalition of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) condemned the decision taken by the government, describing it as the high level case of corruption and squandermania.

The Chairman of the Coalition, Abdulrahaman Abdullahi, while reacting to the development in a message sent to THISDAY, said it was one of the ways through which local governments’ funds were been siphoned in the state by the government.

He said in a state like Katsina where children received education on bare floor, access to healthcare was poor due to shortage of human resources and medical equipment and potable water inaccessible to many communities, for government to withdraw such “stupendous amount” for Buhari’s visit was totally unacceptable.

He said: “This money, if properly utilised, is enough to pay one year allowances for over 4,000 casual workers in the state, provide 500 communities with potable water or fabricate 50,000 for our students to learn in a more conducive atmosphere.

“After all, this has clearly tells us that what the government has been saying about local government areas’ inability to pay their workers’ salaries due to insufficient funds is not true”.

Also reacting, the state Chairman of Atiku/Lado Integrity Forum, Lawal Audi-Yar’Adua, said the gesture showed that the Masari-led government was not sensitive to the plights of the millions of citizens of the state.

Addressing journalists in Katsina Monday evening, Yar’Adua alleged that the government was planning to use the funds to campaign for the candidates of the All Progressives Congress (APC) ahead of the forthcoming general election.

Instead, he said, the government should use the money to tackle what he referred to as the myriad of security, health, education and economic challenges bedevilling the state.

However, the state Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Hon. Ya’u Umar Gwajo-Gwajo, told journalists at a press conference that there was no such approval from the state government.

The commissioner, whose letter was addressed to, said: “There is no such approval from the state government, and I am not aware of such approval because I have not been in the office because we are campaign for our senatorial candidate.”

Related Articles