Articles

Time to Unbundle Nigeria

25 Jul 2012

Views: 11,284

Font Size: a / A

jonathan-backpg.jpg - jonathan-backpg.jpg

When an organisation becomes unwieldy, inefficient, corrupt, wasteful and incapable of delivering on its mandate or bringing value to its stakeholders, one of the accepted solutions is to unbundle it. That would mean the creation of smaller, more efficient organizations with greater efficiencies of scale. It would also imply specializations in the different organizations so that one mammoth entity is  not saddled with the responsibility of doing everything.


In Nigeria, we are already applying the unbundling principle to some of our public corporations: the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) is being unbundled, the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is facing the same fate in the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB). However, the entity that is most in need of unbundling is the Nigerian Federation. It is more unwieldy than NNPC, more inefficient than PHCN and more corrupt than both put together.


The Nigerian federation is not working and cannot work in its present form because we have a sharing federation. A lorry cannot fly, for the simple reason that it is not designed to fly. In the same vein the Nigeria federation cannot succeed as a productive nation because it is not designed to produce. Nigeria needs to be unbundled to create a productive federation where all parts can produce and contribute not equally but in equal strength.


The argument has been made that the present structure of Nigeria was necessary to curb the strength of the regions, and ensure the stability of the country. The result has been an overkill. We now have states that are clearly incapable of meeting even the elementary requirements of organised modern government, and not to mention preparing its citizens to compete in the global economy. Every federation succeeds on the strength of its federating units, to create a federation where the federating states have no capacity, authority or freedom to deliver is a tragedy.


We must never make the mistake of thinking that Nigeria is more important than its citizens; the future of Nigeria as a united country is meaningless and unachievable except it guarantees the safety, security and prosperity of its people.


The problem is that the federation in its present structure is designed as a sharing unit. Every action and evaluation in the federation is guided by the philosophy of sharing. As a sharing structure Nigeria has actually performed well. Nigeria has 36 states and a federal capital territory, 774 local government areas, hundreds of useless federal and state ministries, agencies, committees, parastatals, commissions etc. spread across the land. All these bodies are in a fierce competition to draw resources from one source. The nature of this competition is responsible for the rot that is Nigeria,  it promotes deceit, that is why we lie about every thing from our census to school enrolment figures. It promotes disunity; that is why our country cannot be united.


In other to justify their  share or demand for a greater share, politicians and other leaders are compelled to exploit differences between peoples to demand for an increase in the allocation of resources or positions. All offices are calculated in the sharing arrangement, and must be used to the advantage of whatever interest was able to capture them.


“Juicy’ offices are regarded as another legitimate way of sharing the national cake. Nobody can be successfully punished for corruption in this sharing structure because the idea of eradicating corruption is a parody in a sharing federation. People are appointed primarily to “take”, “collect”, or “settle” themselves, and “carry along’ their people, or interest group. Corruption in office begins from the day of appointment, when the villagers abandon their farms to celebrate their good fortune.

The most important tool in the fight against corruption is the disapproval and opprobrium of the society and your peers. We will never get that in our sharing federation because every means that you employ in getting something out of the system will meet the approval of your community and your peers who are similarly engaged, in an equally desperate quest for any advantage in getting a share of the national cake.
The sad reality of our situation is that the population has clearly overtaken the entirety of available resources, and everything is now stretched to breaking point.


This is the end of the road.  Everything that can be shared has been zoned and shared. With nothing left to share, and the vast majority of our population still mired in hunger,   poverty, illiteracy or half- baked education, unemployment, and anger, our natural reaction is to believe that the reason for this is because there are corrupt leaders in charge who are not sharing things equitably enough, or  that if we have our own state or local government, we will be able to get our share. The sad truth is that the poverty index in Nigeria in 1974, when we had 12 states was less than 40 percent, today with 36 states poverty is up by more than 70 percent. More unproductive states may deliver a few more dual carriage ways, loads of government houses, commissioners quarters, federal secretariats and other ill maintained structures of government presence but it has clearly not delivered on the promise of a better life and greater opportunities for the broad majority of our citizens.


Solution?  Let us unbundle Nigeria, let us restructure the country to create more efficient units in the states with true freedom and the resources to mobilise their people and plan for the future. We will then have a federal government that will be smaller, more efficient and more effective in its more limited functions as a regulator and enforcer. Taking more resources to the states creates an immediate advantage. Contrary to the fears being expressed in non- oil producing states, unbundling will not affect current revenue profiles, on the contrary, all states will get more from our oil revenues because along with the transfer of several federal functions to states will also come a massive reduction in the federal share.


But more important than money, is that the state will actually be given freedom to plan. If you then choose to lie about your population, it will be your choice, if you prefer  to have a hundred local governments it will be your choice, if you elect to pay what the federal government pays its civil servants it will be your choice. States can actually determine their own priorities, compete, learn and cooperate with one another.

States should run their own criminal justice system, build and operate their own prisons, airports etc. States should determine their own system of local government administration, accredit and brand their own education, health, and legal systems, and also license their own practitioners. The federal government will remain the guarantor of our common freedoms ensuring that no state is allowed to discriminate against any Nigerian within the republic. Maintaining our common defence, providing a more effective federal police that is respected as an unbiased umpire in disputes between states and within states as it affects the fundamental rights of citizens under the federal constitution.


In such a federation, states will get oil revenue, but they will realise that they either utilize every kobo prudently and productively or they will be left behind. In this race no one will stand still once the starting short is fired. This competition and freedom will convert our sharing federation into a productive federation that will bring out all the hidden strengths and advantages in every part and every individual. It will unleash the full energy of our sleeping giant.


The greatest argument against giving power to the states is that it will make the governors too powerful. The governors already have power, what this change will do will be to give them real responsibility, and transfer to them the actual burden of governance. It will humble the governors. The size of your allocation will cease to count and the number of your civil servants will cease to matter. What will count is the quality of life under your watch. To crown it, let us give every chief executive one single term of five years. Do your best or do your worst and step aside so that Nigeria can keep moving. I rest my case.

• Senator Abe represents the Rivers South East Senatorial District in the National Assembly.

Tags: Backpage

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (35)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Dear Senator Abe, thanks for your write up, but as an enlighten actor in the Nigerian project, please could you share with in a few step how you'll hope to achieve this "unbundling" as you put it. Its not just enough to tell us you have a wet dream. Thank you Sir.

    From: Abu Emmanuel

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Dear Senator Abe, thanks for your write up, but as an enlighten actor in the Nigerian project, please could you share with in a few step how you'll hope to achieve this "unbundling" as you put it. Its not just enough to tell us you have a wet dream. Thank you Sir.

    From: Abu Emmanuel

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Dear Senator Abe, thanks for your write up, but as an enlighten actor in the Nigerian project, please could you share with in a few step how you'll hope to achieve this "unbundling" as you put it. Its not just enough to tell us you have a wet dream. Thank you Sir.

    From: Abu Emmanuel

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Honourable Senator, beautiful piece and the best advice I have seen from any politician ever. In a line in the penultimate paragraph, you have said "In such a federation, states will get oil revenue", you just trying to be balanced and I understand since you are a politician so you had a need to be balanced. To stop the complete "Sharing" problem of Nigeria, only states that produce Oil should get oil revenue with revenue accruing to the Federation as agreed. All states should get from what they produce. Every States should look within them and look for ways to produce. The concept of Federacy is that every federating unit should be something to the table at the center and not solely look to take as is presently the case in our "Sharing" Feseration.

    From: Emeka

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Right on point..this is the way to go!

    From: The patriot

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Good argument, the federal government should be unbundled so that efficiency will take over. But sir let this unbundling start from you; unbundle you LGA, Gokana Local Government of Rivers State. Because you are planning to take over from Amaechi you now want governors to have more powers. Thank God you know that people are appointed to take care of their people and how many of your people have you taken care of since your appointment as commissioner, as SSG now appointed (not elected) as a senator. What effort are you making to make sure that the judgement against Shell about what they did to your people of Ogoni is executed Mr Senator and preacher of Unbundling Nigeria when it is for selfish interest. Federal govt is cheating us yet we are cheating ourselves. God is watching all of you.

    From: Mr Felix

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • What are proposal...but who then bells the cat

    From: Mide

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Spot on Senator. Enough of this monster called Federal government.

    From: Glory Erere

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Thanks senator Abe, a wonderful write up.

    From: Stilon

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Beautiful.

    From: Uzo

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • You just hit the nail on the head. How I wish other senators will jettison their selfish interest and join you in this crusade for a truly united and prosperous Nigeria made up of efficient federating units.

    From: Babs

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Senator, your case is note worthy. It is people like you, a thinker that is needed in the senate.

    From: Absam

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Nigeria can only work when people like the senator and others like him in positions of authority adopts one principle ''learn to live simply so that others can simply live''. Nothing short of that, if we like we can unbundle nigeria into ten or rewrite constitution ten times nothing will change. Our problem is just greed.

    From: chidi

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Wonderful thoughts. we need to start on this immediately

    From: omorere

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Distinguished Senator you have hit the nail on the head, but unfortunately most Nigerians have been so traumatized that they now prefer to hit their heads on the nail. Man by nature tries to resist change. Man by nature abhors anything bitter and we know that truth is bitter. These two traits of nature are accounting for our playing the ostrich over Nigerian statehood. Truth is Nigeria is not only unwieldy as currently constituted but also unproductive. States are no longer looking inwards to generate revenue but ready to rush to Abuja to share oil wealth. 36 states with all the overheads and vulgar perks of office cannot make for a viable Nation-state. I think we should consider the 6-zonal structure to replace the 36 states and allow every zone to develop and grow through harnessing the resources God has blessed us with, as was done during the 3-regional structure. There is insincerity of purpose in the land and we cannot make progress with falsehood and deceit.

    From: SANJO ACHODO

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This is a populist write-up that initially showed sincere concerns but later ended with many questions unanswered. The case has not been rested, indeed it hangs. The wite-up initially captured attention due to the calibre of the writer - someone that has 'been priviledged/honoured/ recognised/ accommodated to be invloved in Rivers State Governance for many years (Odili and Amaechi inclusive).
    The first fatal flaw is that the wrter followed the current common thinking (unbundling, devolution, more empowered states, 5-year single term etc etc).
    Questions: Are you sure that taking more resources to the states will create an immediate advantage? With the present bloated regular and political structure and staff? Any reason to believe so? (one state has recently added/elevated more perm secs)
    What assurance do we have that a more empowered Niger delta state (for example) will translate to more empowerment and better life for the constituent oil producing communities and responsibility for remedying their environmental burden?
    Will devolution extend to the political parties and the league of god fathers or will governoship candicacy still be at mercy of the priviledged caucuses?
    Will giving the governorsmore power andmoney 'humble' them? Any proof/basis for this claim?
    Will one term of 5 years do the magic or will it just be enough for any vagabond in power (vip) to take the nation/ state / local governement to the cleaners (steal all the funds)? etc etc.

    From: Adeleke

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Great piece ! But...why would it all be about resources. True Nigeria has become poorer than it used to be. This really had nothing to do largely with the current structure but all to do with the paradox of plenty. Suffice to say that even with 100% derivation, states that think they have natural resources might not still achieve comparative development. Oil is not produced! Simply put! It's only a means to another end. All this arguments about producing oil only shows the shallowness of those who use this as bait. Look around see the rise of divers oil produces even Nigeria largest Market America already has alternatives. Clearly oil is not a futuristic planning factor. So we better be more introspective and visionary in all.

    From: Stan

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Distinguished Senator Abe, i must commend you for this wonderful piece. we have gotten to a point in this country where we must begin to tell ourselves the truth. why do we have governments if not to provide for our common goods. some politicians do not want to discuss this issue because of their selfish interest. Healthy competition is good and will bring out the best in people. During the civil war of 1967-1970, the ibos made use of their best hands to manufacture some of the weapons they used to prosecute the war. Where are our best hands? The environment has not been conducive for them to excel. They are developing other economies at our own detriment. we need to rediscover our value system. A system that rewards hardwork, a system that places intergrity over and above easy wealth, a society that respects the santicity of the human life. Politics should be seen as a call to service and not a call to stupendous wealth. The moment our politicians begin to place national interest above their personal interest, that is when we can say we have started making progress. Senator Abe has done his best, i hope others will join him in this crusade.

    From: Gabriel

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • I like this article for a number of reasons. I like that the title was direct on the subject many of us, especially the ruling elites, fear to broach; particularly, it is instructive that the writer is one of the current elites. I also like that the article spoke one singular truth about Nigeria - it is a country structured not to function especially in the present day global trend of things. Beggers are never achievers. In Nigeria, from the federating units down to the individuals, we literally beg for everything ranging from freedom to livelyhood. In Nigeria, it appears all that we have are priviledges - we have no right to anything, afterall the country is sustained on oil revenues and not on the efforts of the citizens. So if you have a job and can 'keep it', it is because you have a benefactor somewhere - nothing comes by merit! If you own anything in the country it would be: "...if not for that person, or if not for so, so and so". And it goes on and on.

    For those who think the solution is not (or at least cannot start) from unbundling Nigeria, please proffer your alternative; an alternative that will be new and not the same 'old stories'. ONLY A FOOL REPEATS SAME THING ALL THE TIME AND EXPECTS A CHANGE!

    From: Arinze

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Good point. But this input can also be discussed on the floor of the senate. I wonder why every one knows what is right but find it difficult to implement from one Govt / president to another. There must be something those in power / govt are not telling the masses. True fedrallisim has been called for since 1963 to date yet the more it is called for the more it is rejected by those in power. Senator Abe, more grease to your elbow and please push this further as you are in the corridors of power. I am sure there are more like minds in the senate and your political inclination to push this proposal to reality.

    From: Chibu _ CEE

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Well thought of. A starting point from where it could be modified to achieve its full potentials or better still have it unbundled into regions.

    @ Adeleke, the question you raised then becomes the problem of the state in particular for your people will bencnmark you against another state of equal magnitude.

    From: Ejike

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • well said...the power hungry centre will resist this .

    From: shina Bam

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Questions for Mr Abe. 'UNBUNDLE' NIGERIA INTO HOW MANY STATES? ''States should run their own criminal justice system''; DOES THAT INCLUDE STATE POLICE? ''In such a federation, states will get oil revenue'' WHAT % SHOULD DERIVATION BE AND WHAT SHOULD GO TO THE CENTRAL GOVT? Great piece sir, but we need clear answers to these and similar knotty questions

    From: Tunde Bello

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Good piece.

    From: Ozioma

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Is it truly a Senator that wrote this??? I am surprised and impressed.

    From: CJ

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • When the foundation of a house is broken it is futile to keep patching the superstructure. The problem with Nigeria is that the foundation is completely broken. Unbundling as advocated by the senator is just more of the same and the outcome will not be any different. What is needed is to tear down the whole rotten structure and lay a solid foundation for the future. A complete restructuring of Nigeria into manageable and viable independent states is needed to prevent its inexorable descent into a failed state.

    From: David Olagunju

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Very interesting write up. Is unbundling the solution to any system that is not working.? The assumption in this write up that I find rather wrong is that the states are better managers of resources. The states are deprived of resources with our present system of government. For me this write up is not sincere because the states have not shown sufficient accountability and management of the meager resources that has been available to them. What is the guarantee that they will do better with more resources. To whom much is given much is required. Resource accountability should be institutionalised before we think of unbundling the federation or fiscal federalism. The states are not faring better than the federal government in terms of resource management. This write up is simpily the the kettle calling the pot black. They are both one and the same thing both are black. No one is better.

    From: KK

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Senator, this is a wonderful piece. What is ur opinion regarding the exorbitant pay esp allowances being recvd mthly/quarterly by u and ur colleagues in the National Assembly?

    From: Machoking

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The argument for a true federation as against what we current have makes sense to me (personal opinion). Continuing to treat an illness with same medication that has consistently failed to yield positive result is nothing but absolute stupidity. Yes we know that market for oil and hence revenue from it which every state is always waiting to be given a handout is truly shrinking, obviously the major customers for the product are increasing finding ways to minimise their dependence on it via alternative sources of energy and the production of highly fuel efficient vehicles and other machineries that are fossil fuel powered.

    Would it not be even more sensible now for the country to take another look on its structure to give opportunity to every docile state in this country without exception to start on time to learn how to generate revenue internally? Or would it rather be better for us to wait until we can no longer sell the so called crude oil in the world market, hence zero revenue to share before we realise we need to wake up. Just a thought.

    From: John

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Total rubbish! How gullible can those praising this trash be.

    From: Joe

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Very strange to read this from a politician in Nigeria

    From: Nyarawo

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This senator has taken on board most of the ideas already canvassed by previous writers/speakers on the same subject matter, including the proposals of Prof. I sawa at the just concluded retreat of the senate committee on constitution review. The issue now is, will those in authority now leave behind their selfish considerations and effect this unbundling? How can the ordinary/informed Nigerians give bite and compel the wielders of political power to implement these proposals which seem to have gained the acceptance of most Nigerians? Even when this unbundling is effected, are we ready to take the reform a bit further to quell the greed of those who will ever be greedy? Because even in a smaller family unit, some still have tendencies to take all unless certain measures are in place to check such excesses. These are my worries and concerns.

    From: Mr. Atokolo Onalo

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Honourable Senator, thanks for firing one of the first shots in the constitution review debate. Constitution Review is what we have been waiting for. It clearly ranks high in the agenda of the Jonathan administration. I pray for the safe landing of the new constitution and a 'New Nigeria' along these lines. It represents bye-bye to bad business.

    From: niyio

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • I have never read a better article in recent times. So succinctly put, simple language and the theme, right on point.

    From: omotayo keshinro

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Who decides what is a fundamental right. In the UK they recently bared tobacco display in shops. So if a state bans alcohol and another bans pork and another bans prostitution people will cry discrimination so who decides what is normal and what is a crime ?

    From: Demola

    Posted: 10 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus