Articles

Obama Has More Campaign Money to Spend than Romney

21 Sep 2012

Views: 4,258

Font Size: a / A

210912N.Barack-Obama-visits.jpg-210912N.Barack-Obama-visits.jpg

President Barack Obama visits Emily Young, first time voter, and student and University of Miami at OMG Burger

AP

At the end of August, President Barack Obama had about $88.8 million to spend on the final months of the campaign, nearly twice as much as Republican rival Mitt Romney, according to campaign fundraising reports released Thursday.

While Romney's report showed he had $50.4 million to spend as of Aug. 31, he also owed $15 million on a $20 million loan taken that month, reports The Associated Press.

The loan helped Romney pay for mailings, staff salaries and TV advertising — and it helped his finances appear healthier on paper. It also boosted his cash-on-hand total from $35.4 million — a number that's closer to a third of Obama's haul.

While Romney raised about $66.6 million in August to Obama's $84.7 million, the $20 million loan boosts Romney's total receipts to $86.6 million, slightly higher than his Democratic opponent's take.

Both Romney and Obama spent about as much as they raised during the month of August. Romney spent about $66.4 million, while Obama spent about $83.7 million.

Romney and the Republican Party raised more than $111 million combined. That was less than Obama and the Democrats, who raised more than $114 million.

Romney took out a $20 million loan in late August, in the days before his campaign had access to funds they had raised for the general election because he was not yet the official nominee. He used general election money as collateral for the loan.

The new report shows he paid back $5 million before the end of August. The campaign said it had paid back an additional $4 million in September, although that data won't be publicly recorded until next month.

Tags: Campaign, Obama, Politics, Romney, World

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (3)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Now I understand! The difference between ours and their system is that campaigns are funded through private funds while in Nigeria they are funded from government proceeds over which the incumbent sits.The problem with theirs is that the major donors (usually the banks and other financial institutions) control the government; which explains why Obama bailed out the banks and not the people. In Nigeria however, government sits over the nation's wealth and does as it pleases. I wonder which one is better?

    From: Kunle Ayoola

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Nigerian way is the best 4 us we Nigerians, cos if private funds enters there, it means that he will pay back which means = awarding out unnecessary contracts, more and more corruption and fighting over money everywhere so........

    From: temple

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • temple wake up. private funds enter in nigeria. unregulated, unreported,unabashed!

    From: mailman

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus