Articles

How PDP Aided Nnaji's Ouster as Power Minister

02 Sep 2012

Views: 21,652

Font Size: a / A

100612F2.Bart-Nnaji.jpg-100612F2.Bart-Nnaji.jpg

Prof. Bart Nnaji

By Chuks Okocha

He resigned as Minister of Power last Tuesday. But it has emerged that the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) actually encouraged President Goodluck Jonathan to remove Prof. Bart Nnaji.

THISDAY is in possession of a damning memo by PDP to President Jonathan and Vice President Namadi Sambo, where the party called for Nnaji's removal. Sambo is also the Chairman of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP).

The memo detailed a harvest of infractions allegedly committed by the former minister in the course of the ongoing privatisation of the power sector.

The letter obtained from a presidency source was written by PDP National Chairman Bamanga Tukur and dated July 22.

In the letter, Tukur highlighted the problems facing the power sector in the country, but indicted Nnaji for alleged complicity in some of the problems and conflict of interest in the privatisation process.

The PDP chairman called for his immediate sack in order for the country to make headway in the ongoing power sector reforms.

Tukur blamed the challenges of power generation on the alleged “Conflict of interest between the office of the Hon. Minister of Power, Prof. Barth Nnaji, who has put personal interest above national imperatives of providing an urgent solution to the gross insufficiency in power generation in Nigeria.

“The minister is known to own large interest in Geometrics, a power company that has been taken over by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) for an unserviceable loan of N25 billion.”

The party chairman said he suspected the former minister also own proxy interests in some of the new independent power plants (IPPs) “hurriedly put together to benefit from Power Purchase Agreement (PPAs) even though such companies have not met the expected milestone that will put them in the position to generate electricity in the foreseeable future, while the other IPPS with ready-to-go practice (who have not met the necessary criteria and are in a position to generate electricity within the next six to 18months) are frustrated from getting approval for the PPAs because they are perceived as competitors to the minister’s self-made list of IPPs.”

This, according to the PDP chairman, is essentially one of the reasons why ready-to- go independent power projects are stunted.

Raising the issue of nepotism in the selection of companies for the power purchase agreement, he alleged that, “The Chief Executive of Bulk Purchasing Trading Company, Mr. Rumundaka Wonodi, was a staff of Geometrics and promotes the same hurriedly-put- together projects with personal interest for the PPAs. These projects, among other things, do not receive even concrete gas supply commitments from the international oil companies (IOCs) since they are not ready-to-go projects. “Meanwhile, ready-to-go IPPs, which secure a concrete gas supply commitment from IOCs, having fulfilled necessary criteria and are in position to generate power immediately, are denied PPAs approval and nominations for World Bank guarantee by the Bulk Trader because they are not on the minister’s favoured list. The consequence of this is that no Power Purchase Agreement is being signed and no IPP project can come on stream in time to fulfill our programme in the power sector.”

According to the memo, “The non-signing of PPAs for ready-to-go projects by the Bulk Trading company hampers the good work done by the gas aggregation company, the IOCs, indigenous oil and gas companies and the Ministry for Petroleum Resources who have put in place a robust plan for ‘Gas for Power’ arrangement. This is because when no PPA gets signed, no gas purchase agreement gets concluded. PPA in essence triggers the securitisation of payment for supply and consequently acts as impetus for investment in substantial gas supply in the value chain.”

He also added, “The indebtedness of the Hon. Minister’s company to Diamond Bank and AMCON is a pressure point that affects an honest and objective discharge of his duties when the reform process is at its infancy”.

In view of these weighty allegations, the PDP chairman said there was “an urgent need to remove all stumbling blocks threatening the fulfilment of our promises. Any further promises to Nigerians on any issue of our national life by the PDP-led administration will be discountenanced if we fail to deliver on the power sector”.

The party called for a far-reaching measure, challenging President Jonathan to: “Relieve the Hon. Minister of Power from his position for his conflicting interest as a regulator and participant in the power sector; reconstitute the management of the Bulk Trading Company; invite the leadership of international energy companies like General Electric of USA, Siemens and Credible IPPs who have ready-to-go projects and have signed Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contracts for their power plants for discussions”.

He maintained that “the international energy companies have already established these ready-to-go projects and would be in a better position to provide a guide. This will be the new momentum to rescue the industry. It is the IPPs that are the engines of power sector participation in the electricity industry, just as privatisation is transfer of existing monopolies to private hands.”

Nnaji eventually resigned his appointment last Tuesday, citing undue pressure from some vested interests in the power sector as the reason for throwing in the towel.

He said he took the decision to save the privatisation and reform programme from people who might want to use ulterior motives to jeopardise it.

His resignation was inevitable after it was discovered during the meeting of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP) a fortnight ago that companies reportedly owned or linked to him made bids for the Afam Generation Company Limited and Enugu Distribution Company Limited.

This runs contrary to the Code of Ethics of the privatisation process, which bars staff of the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) and members of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP) from buying shares in companies being privatised.

Speaking further on why he quit, Nnaji said that rather than drag President Jonathan and the entire privatisation process through the mud, he chose to quit.

He, however, said he reminded the president that he had brought it to his attention two weeks earlier that a company he owned was part of a bidding consortium which submitted bids for Enugu Distribution Company.

The former minister further said that his time as a government official, first as special adviser to the president, and then as power minister, had been fraught with all sorts of efforts to bring him down.

He felt that rather than allow the naysayers destroy the entire process, it was better for him to leave.

President Jonathan, however, gave Nnaji an official clearance, saying he accepted his resignation to protect the privatisation process.

Speaking at a town hall meeting in Onitsha, Anambra State during his visit to the state on Thursday, the president said the former minister did nothing wrong.

Tags: Featured, News, Nigeria, Power Minister

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (15)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • See tukur who is most guilty on account of participation in the subsidy scheme and the theft thereof,accusing someone of conflict of interest!I am now convinced Prof was forced to resign on account of frustrating Tukur and his sorts from owning power discos.

    From: joseph Mbah

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The Presidency's communication strategy sucks. In removing removing Bart Nnaji, the Presidency should have recognised the controversy it would have encountered and in so doing should have put in place a strategy to sensitise the polity. The reasons now been made public should have been released first followed by his direct sack by the President. This would have shown strenght of the presidents no nonsense policy and would have strenghtened the presidents hand in the administration of the reformation of the power sector. Now the Presidency has put itself in the position of defending a good act. Who advised the President to allow the man to resign when he should have been sacked?

    From: Usman Abubakar

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The same old story. I before others.

    From: Yemi Omowumi

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • THE SAME BAMANGER TUKUR WHOSE COMPANY HIS SON ALLEGEDLY USED TO DEFRAUD THIS NATION OF BILLIONS IN OIL SUBSIDY. NOW IF TUKUR IN HIS CAPACITY AS PDP CHAIRMAN CAN INFLUENCE THE DROPPING OF A MINISTER OF GOVERNMENT, WHO SAYS HE CANNOT INFLUENCE PROCEEDINGS IN HIS SON'S TRIAL USING THE SAME CAPACITY AS PDP CHAIRMAN. THAT IS WHY WE SAY THAT BAMANGA TUKUR MUST RESIGN AS PDP CHAIRMAN TO AVOID CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS IT WERE.

    From: Okey

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • He who must go to equity must go with clean hands. The memo by the PDP chairman to me is nothing but a clear plot borne out of selfishness to blackmail Prof. Barth Nnaji out of office to make way for 'their' selfish participation in the power sector privatization. Bamanga Tukur's son ( who I suspect is a front for the father) was indicted in the oil subsidy fraud;has he resigned as PDP chairman?

    From: Ocheke

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The old manwould rather have his son jailed than honorably own up the subsidy mess and resign with the same measure. He ran Nigerian Ports Authority for years with the same jaundiced eye that has been carried over to PDP management.Nigerians will make sure they watch him with every information available and force him to own up his mess.

    From: Onu Otile

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Thanks to the honourable minister for taking an honourable bow out of the Nigerian power saga.My fair wish is that other corrupt elements in various sectors of the economy be fished out and forced to resign as well.They all no the rules but refuse to play by them due to greed, lack of scruples and self discipline.It is a pity that they have marred the image of the so called elites of the Nigerian society.The more educated they are,the more unscruplous they become.What a shameful exit,having lost the opportunity to have had his name written in tablets of gold in the anals of Nigerian power supply.
    I wish to commend President G.E.A. Jonathan for heeding to advice of the PDP chieftain but I equally submit that strict compliance be adhiered to in the selection of the IPPs to known names like American GEC, Siemens of Germany,Marubeni of Japan (to mention but a few ) who can deliver and could be held accountable.Do not permit Bamanga Tukur( and the like ) introduce incompetent hands that could mess up your genuine effort.
    Further,we recommend a stepup of your fight against corruption and abuse of office. There are clear consequencies for crimes of corruption as stated and spelt out by the constitution.ENFORCE the constitution.It is your duty as the chief executive who has all the power to do what is right.We are solidly in your support.The institutions are weakened by corruption in high places.Corrupt public office holders have to be jailed and our money returned.This is making the uninformed populace poorer and thereby more desperate in their fight for survival.

    From: Carlos Benson

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Anybody in PDPig now can tell Mr President what to do and he will because of 2015 interest. God owns everything including 2015.

    From: femi Mathew

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • the truth is that the tukur s are not having the influence they had in oil subsidy in electricity subsidy so that they can do what they know best???.

    From: kunle

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • BAMANGER TUKUR 'S SON INHERITED IT FROM THE DAD WHO STOLE ALL IGBO IMPORTED OKADA WHILE HE WAS MD OF NPA BEFORE THE OUTBREAK OF THE CIVIL WAR.HE THEN SHARED IN THE THEN GONGOLA STATE FOR VOTES IN 1983 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION.IAM NOT SURPRISED BY THIS OLD AGABUS WHOSE SON THAT HE APPOINTED MD OF HIS BUSINESSES USED THE SAME COMPANY TO CLAIM SUBSIDY FOR FUEL HE NEVER IMPORTED CLEARLY TO HIS KNOWLEDGE AND HE IS PLAYING OSTRICH GAME NOW.HE EVENTUALLY WENT TO COURT TO SIGN SURETY FOR HIS THIEVING SON BUT HE SAYS HIS SON IS AN ADULT AND SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR HI ACTIONS .THIS GUYS THINK THT WE HAVE FLUID INSTEAD OF BRAIN IN OUR SKULS BUT THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBERED.

    From: UZOH

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The state governors are not serious, otherwise they should involve as stake holders in the privatization process by asking for 40% shares in electricity companies, if this was done it would not encourage these type of sharp practices where unscrupulous individual will make electricity too expensive for poor people after the privatization. Both Tukur and Nnaji were fighting for themselves not for the interest of the nation.

    From: omo oba

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • we are passionately waiting for more revelations. Nigeria ,we hope wlill come out better.

    From: lachime

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Bamaanga Tukur is not an angel "he who lives in a glass house should not throw stone" I think the best thing for him is to resign as PDP chairman.If he can see conflict of interest in Nnaji's case what about the issue of fuel theft and over invoicing involving his son; uuhhhnn he cannot see any conflicting interest in that as PDP chairman abi,can you see kettle calling pot black.Oga Bamanga please do the honorable thing and walk tall with your shoulder high resign to avoid conflict of interest.

    From: Taiwo

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This is simply hogwash and bullshit... ..this whole charade can at best be described as an after-thought and a deliberate attempt to rubbish Prof Barth Nnaji's good works. Whoever released an obviously bias, and heavily doctored PDP Chairma...n's petition to the Press has the blessing of Bamanga Tukur himself. If we look critically at the logic of the argument allegedly put forward by Bamanga, one can deduce with benefit of hindsight that he is the major opposition to Prof Nnaji and obviously has vested interest in bringing so-called ready-to-go IPPs to gain undue advantage of the entire process set in-place by Nnaji, and ofcourse Nnaji had proved stubborn and as usual, GEJ was dragged into the matter. Anyway, now that Nnaji is out of the equation let's see what further influence Bamanga Tukur and his clique will bring to bear. God please save our dear country from blood suckers.

    From: Jude

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • President GEJ, Nigerians are watching. What you applied to Nnaji should be applied to others directly or indirectly involved in other corrupt practices. Otherwise your rating will continue to drop.

    From: Ayo Ola.

    Posted: 8 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus