Articles

Fuel Subsidy: FG Declaring War on Nigerians, Says CPC

02 Jan 2012

Views: 7,098

Font Size: a / A

B071102-Dizeani-Allison-Mad.jpg-B071102-Dizeani-Allison-Mad.jpg

Minister of Petroleum, Mrs Dizeani Allison Madueke


By  Onyebuchi Ezigbo     

The Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) has described Federal Government's decision to commence withdrawal of subsidy on petroleum products Sunday without approval by the National Assembly as tantamount to a declaration of economic war against the populace.

The party in a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Rotimi Fashakin, said the action of the Federal Government “is not only traitorous, but very callous desire to hurt the Nigerian people”.

Fashakin noted that the implementation of the fuel subsidy removal by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)-led Federal Government was coming on the heels of the decision not to provide for fuel subsidy in the 2012 budget awaiting the assent of the National Assembly.

He said what is bewildering, however, is that a regime that pretends to derive its legitimacy from the people is implementing a policy that obviates the need for the assent of the people’s representatives. “This is a clear mutation towards fascism and declaration of war on the Nigerian people!

“The PDP-led Federal Government, having tied this utterly insensitive policy to the budgetary provision, has with hubris and much scorn of the people, embarked on its implementation before the necessary assent of the National Assembly,” he said.


He expressed the concern of CPC that the PDP-led regime had taken similar steps to ignore the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by spending above N1.3 trillion as against the N240 billion provided for and appropriated in the 2011 fiscal year.
“It is our considered view that this decided action of the Federal Government is not only traitorous, but very callous desire to hurt the Nigerian people, while pandering to the imperialistic intervention of foreign interest. Undoubtedly, this latest decision clearly negates the provision of Section 14(2b) which declares that, the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government,” he added.

Tags: CPC, Featured, Fuel Subsidy, Nigeria, PDP, Politics

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (32)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Removing fuel subsidy is not something that has to be done evernight! Its indeed unfair to Nigerians, becouse majority of the population are against it. Therefore is not a do or die affair!

    From: Dahiru

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • removing subsidy without d go ahead of national assembly,well, we shall see where d game ends.happy viewing.

    From: martins

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • If there's anytinh dat is more war is wat we ar going 2 do.Bcos dis PDP pple ar evil an God will deal wit dem.

    From: Anna

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • this is madnes. we have suffered alot hardly we eat three square meal a day, no job, no good health care, no good road.

    From: AMINU MUHAMMAD

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • If there is going to be any challenge against removal of fuel subsidy it cannot be led by CPC.When Abacha increase fuel by over 300% from N3 to N11,Buhari,CPC leader supported it and even led the body set up to manage the funds wript off from the suffering masses then,we didn't die then,we r still here.CPC is only interested in distabilising the nation majorly because the lost the election,why do they always use the words like war,etc... We need geniun leadership with unbiased objective.

    From: Ose

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • I think that Jonathan is the Anti-Christ in our time.He has never wanted to here from the populace.just look how he was just allowing innocent citizens to die all this while before declaring emergency and closing borders if CAN was not on his neck.

    From: Victor

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Fuel subsidy removal as a new year gift is the worst thing that a goverment can do that is against the pople wish.I believe soon revolution is cooming to Nigeria just as in egypt,lybia.

    From: Mina

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • i am sorry to say this both the president,President Goodluck Jonathan and the Minister of Petroleum, Mrs Dizeani Allison Madueke,are just taking nigerians for a ride but i just want the president to know that what happened in most northen african countries can still happen in nigeria if we dont correct all our mistake now

    From: nodu

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • fuel subsidy removal confirms that,those charge with public offices do not mean well for the entire masses.when it was 65 naira per litre,things are cost,now with this current increase,how is the common man going to survive.The impact will be increase in corruption,increase in crime rate,increase in sexual immorality and so on.God save us all.

    From: Best Toweh

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Jonathan is the worse thing that has happend to Nigeria. I regret voting Him. We all knw the importers of these petroleum products that is why he is removing the subsidy withouth fixing our refineries. Did IBB remove subsidy to build Abuja? Its an indication that subsidy has nothing to do with development instead himself and the so called importers want to extort Nigerians. Jonath now means failure the world should knw.

    From: Chux

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • President Jonathan would have listened to voice of the people. Afterall, that is what democracy is all about. It is very clear that our representatives did not back his action. So, Whose interest is Jonathan representing?

    From: Okwudiba Nnamdi

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The fact remain that nigeria populace asked for this during election.

    If we the nigerians cannot vote rightly them no one will govern us rightly .

    From: wale

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This is very heartless,calluous,treacherous,insensitive,wicked,dreadful,and deceitful of this Government.I blame the Nigerian populace for swallowing all sorts of trash being fed to it by those in government.We should learn from the ARABS,who despite all the comfort still rebel against their leaders.What are we waiting for?

    From: A Kwapgai

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Emotional driven Nigerians. Transformation comes with great challenges as the one the nation is facing presently.Be calm; Jonathan means well for Nigeria.

    From: Godson

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • We,Nigerians say NO to fuel subsidy removal and shall enmass,demonstrate this on the streets nation wide,Allah's willing!Fellow comrades in the NLC,IPMAN,TUC,PENGASSAN,NUPENG,PTD,NARTO,NBA,ASUU,NUT,NANS,WONEN LEADERS,HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVITS,NGOs and other Nigeria's well wishers,be ready for a showdown against this anti-people's system.May the Boko Haram unleash their terror on pro subsidy removal,amin!

    From: Tafidan DDAJI

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Fellow Nigerians, don't listen to sycophant. CPC party is nothing but a destroyer. It wants to settle political point with that inflammatory statement. Don't be deceive. They are bunch of liars.

    From: Dr Adewumi

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The fuel subsidy removal is already havin a great impact on d Nigeria people look around you

    From: Pauljohn

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Its a big shame that our leaders think that they are gods. God made provisions for our comforts but our human leaders are always in a hurry to make life unbearable to both d lower/middle class. Why removing the subsidy without providing succour to cushion d economic bites dat will surely follow. High transport cost, rents, food stuff, school fees etc etc. All to face the meagral salary.
    Must the removal be NOW? Why the hurry? Pls d govt mustve its 10years developmt plan to include that removal. Otherwise remove 15 while working to obviate mass destruction of our people in 2years.

    From: Obie

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • These guys are just a bad taste to behold.The voices of the mercies are on mute but God will judge them all.

    From: Olu

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Book Haram vs Luck Haram....boko haram throw bomb,50 peolpe die..luck haram remove subsidy,Nigerian masses (over 90million pipl) die slowly:'( God help Nigeria

    From: wande

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Those talking of retaining fuel subsidy should please have a rethink. Are they saying that we will continue to support the very few Nigerians involved in the importation and who are feeding fat on all of us. Why can`t we for once give a good move a chance. The CPC that is critisizing the move is simply playing politics. Ghana just quietly did theres without any fuse. Why must everthing of ours be full of argument and confusion. Go to the United States , they too produce fuel yet each filling station sell its own fuel at its own price because they also depend on import to suplement their local products. So most filling stations in the US sell at varying prices. The consumer simply goes to the one that meets his pocket. I think our concentration is on compelling the government to ensure that the local refineries work so that the cost of the product will be less.
    As for the Labour Union, they should spare us their headache. It is likely that they are working for some importers that want to continue the free flow of subsidies. Labour sould stop pretending they are working for the masses. They are simply working for some suppliers. If they are truely comrades, then they should work more for the local refineries to work and ensure that their representatives in the refineries are doing the right things.

    From: chine_melu

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • I think it is high time for the civil society to rise up against this barbaric, callous and wicked decision by the PDP-led federal government. And Nigerians should clearly understand that this is a struggle for all of us. A genuine struggle that has no ethnic or religious coloration. We should follow all the lawful and constitutional avenues to tell Jonathan that we cannot take this non-sense.

    From: Abba Anwart

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • All these write ups are for GEJ,i prefer a northerner to an i jaw man,how did Nigerians ever think that a "man that had no shoes " had no business being the president cos he couldn't think of creative ways to protect his legs. Cos their was nothing upstairs

    From: malachy

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Just that Mr President has forgotten what happened to one of our formal President who increased Kerosine price(He died in the office), The same thing can still happen to him. God will hear the cry of the Masses shortly.

    From: ONIMISI GABRIEL

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • well fuel subsidy has been removed and there is nothing we can do about it. it is the ingridient of transformation. we survived IBB sap and all the increases in PMS, from N3 during Abacha regime to the present pump price of N65, we did not die. let us give the PDP led FG a chance. NIGERIA is bigger than anybody. protest will not solve the problem, it is to enrich the union leaders. GEJ and his economic team means well for NIgerians otherwise Prof. Okonjo Iweala will not support it. She left her post as president of world bank NEW YORK, in order to fix the economy.

    From: utche egbogu

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • It is idiotic and callous for the president and his subordinate to implement the much talked about subsidy removal. It begins to suggest that the president derives his powers from the devil and not the people. How on earth can any of the people supporting the subsidy removal justify this insensitive decision by this govt when in several fora where the issue has be discussed, ministers of this govt. have told Nigerians that the implementation of the policy will commence from April, after far reaching consultation and possible approval of the 2012 budget which do make provision for the subsidy by the national assembly. this unprecedented removal of subsidy against popular protest by the Nigerian people has shown that this govt can not be trusted. There is a claim that, subsidy does not exist due toncrude oil swap for refined PMS agreement between the govt and the commodity traders which has not been debunked by the govt. Let the govt respond to these releases on the fuel subsidy issue. Mr. president does not love Nigeria more than those of us who are saying that the implementation of the subsidy removal without internal refining capacity as ill timed and insensitive.

    From: Erinyo

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • The Gross Insensitivity of the GEJ led Government By: Dr. O. A. EWEDAIRO

    The GEJ led government have made a hasty and imoral economic decision. I will be arguing for and against the government and at the end I will show that the evidence against this government is just too damning.Some of the points I have made before and I will add a few others to buttress my argument.

    1: From an economic perspective Nigeria wastes a lot of money on fuel subsidy and therefore it's removal will definitely add to our foreign reserves, and could potentially be used for other "more productive" things including infrastructural development. However recent finding puts big quetions on the integrity of the government on the so called subsidy. Prof. Tam David West a former petroleum minister suggest that the may actually be no subsidy afterall. 2ndly he also suggest that the Nigerian refineries (all 4 of them), however moribound they may be could still pottentially meet the fuel needs of Nigerians. We can almost infer that the government deliberately do nt want these refineries to work. finally on this point I ask If I grow yams in my backyard and I sell some of it to others will I sell to my family at thesame price that I sell to outsiders? why then should the Nigerian government be trying to equate the selling rate of crude oil outside Nigeria to that being sold to Nigerians? Conclussion they are just insensitive.

    2: Government claims to be deregulating to allow market forces drive down the prices (just like the telecomms industry) Well that logically makes sence, but in the Nigerian context it does not and Telecomms and Fuel are not thesame. Why you may ask? First Telecommunication does not directly affect the price of food, transportation, and basically survival, fuel on the other hand does these thing (I will clarify on survival in other points). 2ndly most average Nigerians waited till the price of Sims dropped drammatically before they got theirs and there are variety of phones to be used based on your income unfortunately the people do not have the luxury of waiting till "competetion" forces the price of fuel down before they use it. Or how do you tell your child just be patient the price of food will soon come down "competetion" will soon bring down the price. This is a form of market failure economist call it "Price Inelasticity" of demand/supply. Price Elasticity simply put means if price goes up demand goes down but when there is inelasticity this does not happen. (Inelasticity occurs when the "goods" are a neccessity as with fuel, health e.t.c)
    There are some basic assumptions in economic theories of a competetive market, they assume income is fairly distributed among the population and we know in Nigeria there is gross inequality in income distrbution. Another assumption for there to be effective competetion is that there are many sellers, free entry into the market and there is little or no supplier induced demand all of which have failed in the Nigerian context. there are few marketer, you can't just enter the oil bussiness and the marketers can induce demand by creating artificial scarcity. I think I have effectively shot down the governments argument about competetion. There are still more economic assumptions that the Nigerian market fails to provide but i do not want to belabour this argument.

    3: The bill for the increment of the minimum wage has been passed for several months yet it has not been implemented. Meanwhile the bill to remove fuel subsidy has not been approved by the majority of the Nigerian legislature and yet there has been a hasty decision to announce the removal of the subsidy.more evidence to show that GEJ led team is insensitive to plight of the average Nigerian.

    4: Close to 80% of the population live on less than $2.00 (N320) a day, this is the world banks poverty threshold (< $1/day is extreme poverty) this threshold is based on ability to buy food. Removing the fuel subsidy will increase cost of transportation and consequently the cost of food. More people will fall below the poverty line because they can not buy food. One grave error with the world bank poverty line is that it does not effectively account for the cost of living (i.e cost of shelter, health care and clothing) what this suggest is that if these are accounted for, more people will be classified as poor! But that is not the worst part, in the hierarchy of needs food is absolutely essential and with limited resources, the survival instinct is to go for food and ultimately forgo other needs and that includes health, so morbidity and mortality of children, pregnant women and men will increase as a consequence of removal of fuel subsidy. As a result of direct causation, poverty will lead to poor health and reverse causation, poor health will lead to poverty!

    5: More than 70% of Nigeria's work force are in the informal sector, most of whom are self employed as Tailors, Barbers, Hair dressers, Pepper millers, Computer analyst, web designers, Okada riders etc. All these businesses generate their power because of the unreliable government power supply (mostly from generators powered by fuel). Removing the fuel subsidy will make it more difficult to earn a living and essentially survive (my point on survival) This will increase the proportion of the population living in poverty (currently stands at 70% using $1.25 as poverty threshold)
    As a long term consequence there could be more criminals terrorizing everyone, as basic survival instincts take over.

    6: This is the most obvious reason for the resistance to the removal of" subsidy." There is absolutely no incentive for Nigerians to support fuel subsidy removal, the funds gained "are meant to be used for infrastructural development" but there have been billions stolen by political office holders and they have been punished with a slap on the wrist, some were even given "National awards" We can directly infer that if the so called gains from subsidy removal are misappropriated the culprits will go unpunished. So we have absolutely no reason to support the governments plans as we can assume it is just another ploy to embezzle Nigeria's money, our money!

    It's saddens me that this is the reality we face in Nigeria and despite the New year celebrations we need to fight this injustice, so share this note with as many of your contacts as possible so we stop having an emotional argument against this problem but rather a well thought out factual and moral argument!

    So I don't just sound like a critic, I will make a few recommendations to the Government to allay the fears of Nigerians before they embark on this evil decision.

    1: Prosecute government officials accused of stealing (a more politicall appropriate term "misappropriate") our money e.g Dimeji Bankole, Gbenga Daniels, Yerima, Odili e.t.c with stricter prnishement at least 20years jail term and also return th stolen funds
    2: Use some of the billions stolen and funds from world bank or foreign reserves to carryout infrastructural development i.e provide at least 16 hours a day of power supply, improve health facilities, improve roads and prosecute contractors who fail to carry out projects to acceptable standards withstrict purnishments as highlighted above.
    3: Optimize the capacity of our refineries and prosecute contractors who have failed to deliver despite billions of dollarsspent on their maintenance.
    4: Implement the new minimum wage

    These will restore some confidence in the Government and then "subsidy" may be removed.

    From: Dr. O.A. EWEDAIRO

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Govnt Sgould Provide job opportunity and stop depending on Crude oil as the only source of income in the country.

    From: Ibrahim rumah Katsina Nigeria

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Please stop calling Jonathan Goodluck. He has nothing but badluck to offer with his illiterate wife and greedy supporters. You dont wake up overnight and make such decisions without putting things in place. The electricity problem has to be fixed and refineries. Overpaid senators salaries should also be reduced if he is looking for ways to cut cost. The Petty increase in minimum wage is not proportional to this increment. I truly feel sorry for BADluck Jonathan and the disgrace he has brought to his people, especially after having being given the opportunity to rule the country the first time. We should stop comparing Nigerian economy to others and Okonjo-Iweala + Sanusi have read too much economic books which is not obtainable in reality and will not work with the nigerian economy. This is reality and not classroom where we do trial & error. The excess made from crude last year, especially considering the price has not been accounted for. Most of the complaints from the subsidy is still from corruption within our National oil companies (NNPC, PPMC) which should be addressed to reduce the cost and not bring more suffering to the people because of the useless minimal increase in Minimum wage. BADluck Jonathan has no human feelings and does not deserve to lead the nation!!!

    From: Lanre

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Please stop calling Jonathan Goodluck. He has nothing but badluck to offer with his illiterate wife and greedy supporters. You dont wake up overnight and make such decisions without putting things in place. The electricity problem has to be fixed and refineries. Overpaid senators salaries should also be reduced if he is looking for ways to cut cost. The Petty increase in minimum wage is not proportional to this increment. I truly feel sorry for BADluck Jonathan and the disgrace he has brought to his people, especially after having being given the opportunity to rule the country the first time. We should stop comparing Nigerian economy to others and Okonjo-Iweala + Sanusi have read too much economic books which is not obtainable in reality and will not work with the nigerian economy. This is reality and not classroom where we do trial & error. The excess made from crude last year, especially considering the price has not been accounted for. Most of the complaints from the subsidy is still from corruption within our National oil companies (NNPC, PPMC) which should be addressed to reduce the cost and not bring more suffering to the people because of the useless minimal increase in Minimum wage. BADluck Jonathan has no human feelings and does not deserve to lead the nation!!!

    From: Lanre

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Badluck jonathan is mad....he as nothing to offer than to kill this country,this subsidy that you have remove will kill ur relative and your supporter,Mother Fucker,Son of a Bitch....I don't care who fuckiing you are men,Badluck Badluck Badluck....

    From: Richard

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • You are a mad man,bastard of nigeria....you are talking about boko haram and you wanted to kill all the Nigerains with ur subsidy haram....Son of a Bitch

    From: Boko Haram

    Posted: 4 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.