Articles

Court Orders CBN to Account for Ibru’s Assets

03 Oct 2012

Views: 6,126

Font Size: a / A

291211T.cecilia-ibru.jpg - 291211T.cecilia-ibru.jpg

Former Managing Director of Oceanic Bank Plc (now Ecobank), Mrs. Cecilia Ibru

By Davidson Iriekpen

Justice Mohammed Idris of a Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, Tuesday ordered the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to declare the whereabouts of the N191 billion in assets seized from the convicted former Managing Director of Oceanic Bank Plc (now Ecobank), Mrs. Cecilia Ibru.

Delivering judgment in a suit filed by the President of Progressive Shareholders Association (PSA), Mr. Boniface Okezie, Justice Idris held that the order must be complied with within 72 hours.

Okezie had instituted the action seeking to compel the bank to release the information under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act.

The judge also ordered CBN to declare what it termed the total cash and value of property recovered from Ibru.

“The Central Bank of Nigeria is hereby ordered to declare the whereabouts of the money recovered from Cecilia Ibru; and what part of this cash and property has been returned to Oceanic Bank and/or its shareholders. What is done officially must be done according to the law,” Idris said.

The judge, however, refused the prayer of the plaintiff seeking the court's order to compel the CBN to also release information on the cost of its banking reforms and the amount of legal fees and other fees paid to professionals and professional bodies.

The plaintiff in the suit had sought the court’s nod to compel the CBN to declare how much of the money was paid to the law firms of Olaniwun Ajayi LP and Kola Awodein (SAN).

Okezie also urged the court to declare how much was paid to Olaniwun Ajayi LP for the prosecution of Ibru and how much of the money stood as commissions on the property recovered from her.

The prayers were turned down because the CBN was justified to have denied the information by virtue of Section 15(1) of the FoI Act and the “legal practitioner-client privilege” as contained in Section 16 of the Act.

The judge upheld the argument of the defendant's counsel, Prof. Gabriel Olawoyin (SAN), even as he added that the plaintiff did not give sufficient evidence relating to “misconduct” in the payments to the law firms.
Okezie, had through his counsel, Chuks Nwachukwu, requested the information in a letter dated January 26, 2012.

Nwachukwu had stated in the letter that his client had observed that the two law firms “have completely dominated representation of CBN and its related bodies in the litigation sparked by the reforms”.

Tags: Featured, News, Nigeria, Oceanic Bank, Ecobank, Cecilia Ibru

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (4)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Wahala dey o!

    From: Amanga

    Posted: 7 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This is another case of a kangaroo judge giving a kangaroo judgement. In case the judge forgot, the CBN is public body funded by the state. It cannot therefore hide under the guise of client-legal practitioner privilege. The actual client if any in this case is the general public which pays the bills and not the management of CBN. This is yet another case in support of the notion that our judges dispense judgements but never justice. The judge should go and read more of the works of Lord Denning.

    From: Odiri C. Oghre

    Posted: 7 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • @ Odiri, abeg do not disgrace Lord Denning. Even public bodies (and the govt) itself is entitled to Attorney-Client Privilege. The privilege actually protects the lawyer as much as it does the client, since it allows the lawyer to render unfettered counsel.

    From: Dayo

    Posted: 7 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • @ Odiri C. Oghre!! Stop displaying your ignorance publicly. The judge is in that position to give effect to the law as passed by the legislature. The law says client-legal practitioner privilege is a defense to an FOI request as the judge stated. You want him to break the law and make his own? The judge has done wonderfully well in accordance with the rule of law which we all want, o jare....

    From: james

    Posted: 7 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus