Articles

CBN: Fuel Subsidy Gulped N1.73tr Last Year

25 Jan 2012

Views: 6,485

Font Size: a / A

N26012-Diezani-Alison.jpg-N26012-Diezani-Alison.jpg

 Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke 

By Onwuka Nzeshi and Ejiofor Alike

The actual bill for fuel subsidy in 2011 was N1.73 trillion, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) said Tuesday.

Various figures had been claimed by government officials, ranging from N1.3 trillion to N1.5 trillion as against the N245 billion provided for in the 2011 Appropriation Act.
Deputy Governor of the CBN, Mr. Kingsley Moghalu, who gave the latest figure with a sense of finality, said that as bankers to the Federal Government, the CBN was in a better position to give the true picture on the issue.

Moghalu spoke while giving testimony before the House of Representatives Committee on Monitoring of the Subsidy Regime.

Meanwhile, Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke, Tuesday said the KPMG audit report on the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) predated her tenure at the ministry, contrary to the accusation that she did nothing about it.

She also explained that there was no discrepancy between the figures given by her ministry and the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) on the average daily consumption of petrol in the country.

Alison-Madueke had at a previous appearance before the panel stated that the country consumes 35 million litres of petrol per day, while the Executive Secretary, PPPRA, Mr. Reginald Stanley, who appeared later, said subsidy was paid on the daily discharge of 59 million litres per day.

The minister said that the 35 million litres was for planning purposes and had been in use over the years.

She said she did not at any time state that the payment for fuel subsidy was based on this projection of 35 million litres per day.

Also Tuesday, the PPPRA restated its earlier position that subsidy payment was based on 58.9 million litres in the first 10 months of last year.

Moghalu said the CBN had about two years ago raised questions over the management of the fuel subsidy and the possibilities of some manipulation of the system.

He said the investigation by the House should be able to get to the root of this suspected manipulation.

“The concern arose mainly as a result of our perception of the implications of possible manipulations of the subsidy regime on the stability of the country’s exchange rate, our external reserves and the banking system. As we all know, non-performing bank loans to petroleum product marketing companies and for stock market transactions were a major contributory factor in the distress suffered by some Nigerian banks in 2008/2009, leading to the Central Bank undertaking extensive reforms in the banking sector,” Moghalu said.

He said that the deductions were made by NNPC at source before payments into the federation account after which the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) distributed the remainder to the three tiers of government.

He said because of the disturbing signals that some banks might have assisted some fuel importers on illegal foreign exchange deals, the CBN had commenced a special audit of the banks to ascertain their level of compliance with the extant financial regulations.

The results of the audit, Moghalu said, would be ready by the end of February 2012 and erring banks would be sanctioned.

Alison-Madueke assured Nigerians of the Federal Government's resolve to implement the independent audit report conducted by KPMG into the activities of operators in the downstream sector of the oil industry.

The minister said the current resolve was geared towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the industry.

The minister, who appeared before the panel for the second time Tuesday, gave updates on the reforms initiated in the oil and gas industry and noted that the Governance and Control Task Force Team which was set up recently in the ministry would deal with fundamental issues from the KPMG audit report.

She said that some of the reforms so far initiated included change of leadership of two regulatory agencies such as the PPPRA; streamlining of downstream supply system which led to the increase in the capacity utilisation of the existing refineries from 30 per cent to 60 per cent; reduction in incidences of pipeline vandalism; setting up of the Task Force on the rehabilitation of the refineries.

Others included the inauguration of Special PIB Task Force; Task Force on Governance and Control meant to eliminate rent seeking and arbitrage as well as the award of contract for the Turn Around Maintenance (TAM) of the existing refineries to the original companies that built them.

She also said that President Goodluck Jonathan had directed the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to look into the books of NNPC and other regulatory agencies as part of efforts to sanitise the system.

In a separate presentation, Group Managing Director of the NNPC, Mr. Austen Oniwon, disclosed that the directive given by former President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua to remove subsidy on kerosene was not implemented due to uncertainties in the sector.

The situation, he said, gave room for the supply of kerosene at a subsidised price up till now.

President of Trade Union Congress (TUC), Comrade Peter Esele, who also appeared before the panel Tuesday, described the PPPRA template as deficient and called for an overhaul of the system.

On the other hand, the Chief Economist of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Mr. Peter Ozon Eso, explained that organised labour had never disagreed with deregulation of the downstream sector of the oil industry, but had always emphasised the need for certain things to be put in place before any genuine reform could be implemented.

Eso said the government incurred the wrath of labour when it went ahead to deregulate without heeding the warnings of labour.

Tags: FAAC, Featured, Fuel Subsidy, News, Nigeria, NNPC, PPPRA, TUC

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (11)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Based on my right to know as a citizen,I wish to ask the following questions;(1) If the amount of domestic daily petrol consumption is 35 million litres,what portion of this figure was supplied by the four local refineries? ; (2) If part of the daily requirement was met through the local refineries(though,operating at low capacity), did NNPC also receive subsidy payments for petrol supplied by the local refineries? (3) What portion of the daily crude oil of approximately 445,000 barrels allocated for domestic consumption was actually refined in 2011 by the four(4) local refineries owned by NNPC?; and (4) If the refineries were not working at full capacity,did the NNPC management look into the option of refining whatever could not be refined locally at offshore refineries and pay only a "through-put fee" to the overseas refineries? As a businessman analysing this situation,I believe that NNPC can explore more cost-effective options in reducing the nation's fuel subsidy bill.Though,I am a strong and ardent supporter of downstream deregulation including complete removal of fuel subsidy,since it is not politically possible to accomplish these goals now,NNPC Managers ought to follow prudent measures to minimise the nation's fuel subsidy payments by processing whatever quantity of crude oil that can not be refined locally in the interim and pay only a "through-put or processing fee" per barrel of crude oil refined outside the country. There is a lot of spare refining capacity in Europe and the USA or some other countries to accommodate our refining needs pending the rehabilitation of the local refineries.Also,there is urgent need for the Federal Government to appoint Independent Board of Directors from outside the industry to supervise both NNPC and the NNPC subsidiaries.The entire management of these corporations should no longer be left in the hands of the managers alone;they should have Independent Supervisory Boards that will hold the managers accountable. Thank you and May God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria!

    From: Michael

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This minister of petroleum should be sack . I heard that she is a sister to President Good luck second wife that is why she is untouchable . Every body in this country knows that this woman is corrupt

    From: Hassan

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • It is a very considerate mo
    ve for the federal government to invite original company that constructed the refineries initially due to the fact that about two to three year back during late president umaru musah ya'radua time there was turn around maintenance carried warri refinery that did not function for up to a month.we the good citizens of this country would appreciate if the government sweep out all the defaulted individuals in both the pppra and nnpc a achieve a success in the reform of the oil sector.

    From: Engr.Eloidor rafiu

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • It is not enough for Peter Esele to describe PPPRA template as deficient. How deficient is is and can he provide a better template for the nation. It is always easy for Nigerian's to run down people and agency's of government at any given opportunity while not having the brain to profer a better solution.

    From: Dr. Brigante

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Madam petroleum minister your explanation could convince whoever.You are only qualify to be a minister under a man like Jonathan who has no grip on his government.So,KPMG report was available before you were employed but you and Jonathan did nothing about it until the people went on protest because you are enjoying the loot.Let me tell you that all the billions you guys had siphon from our resources will turn to gravel under your very eyes .Theieves.

    From: Bamidele Joseph

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • THIS FIGURE IS SO OUTRAGEOUS AND IT'S NOT ABOUT WHETHER IT IS N1.73TR, N1.3TR ETC SUBSIDY BUT, WAS THIS AMOUNT IN THE SPOTLIGHT ACTUALLY AND STRICTLY USED FOR SUBSIDY? THINGS MUST CHANGE. ALL THESE FIGURES BEING UNRAVELED EVERY PERIOD IS NOT WHAT NIGERIANS COUNT AS TRANSPARENCY EVEN IF THAT IS WHAT WAS REALLY SPENT RIGHTLY. WAS IT USED FOR THE PURPOSE.

    From: ISH

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • more outrageous and unbelievable

    From: Ishaya

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • ITS REALLY SAD THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT PROSECUTING CLEAR CRIMINALS WHO STEAL OPENLY

    From: CHIME

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This country has been taken to the cleaners, under a weak supervision (and collaboration?) of those entrusted to supervise her petroleum affairs. It is a seriously shameful and disgraceful situation.

    CBN has now authoritatively told us that N1.73 trillion was paid on 'subsidy' (as against a budgeted amount of N240billion), even without appropriation.

    How can our honourable minister quote 35million litres per day 'for planning purpose' at a forum that required actual figure to be quoted? Was it rocket science and so difficult to obtain the actual figures? PPPRA quoted 59million litres per day, leaving a 'mere' 24 million litres per day as gap.

    Why should our honourable petroleum lady be waiting for a KPMG Audit report that was already in the public domain to be 'fomally transmitted' to her before she could take action? Where lies basic proactive, principle-driven management?

    'Moghalu said the CBN had about TWO YEARS AGO (emphasis mine) raised questions over the management of the fuel subsidy and the possibilities of some manipulation of the system'.

    1) Who received these questions that were raised by the CBN? Was it the President? Mrs Minister? NNPC-GMD? PPPRA Chief? EFCC?
    2) What was done on the questions that were raised by the CBN?
    3) Why did CBN wait till now to inform us that they raised questions 2 years ago?
    4)Why couldnt the EFCC 'be invited' since 2 years ago?

    These seriously question our competence and integrity.


    Now, we should see why this country is doomed to the back-seat and primed to fail. Her undertakers should cover their faces in shame.

    OUR DEMAND: Government must trace where the bulk of this N1.73 trillion has gone to, even go as far as foreign bank accounts and repatriate the overspent money back to us. We need such money to fix our infrastructure, fund our education, health, research and provide job opportunities for our millions of unemployed/under-employed youths and graduates some who are now security threats to us all.

    We can not afford, and must not to follow, this ignoble path again.

    From: Nurein

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • @Michael: Your questions are logical and should be the basis of any inquiry, but the idiots in the house of representatives who are part of the fraud will never ask the right question. Even the minister and her group could not even articulate their submission in the line with your questions. I have always said that this lady minister seem corrupt but always pretend to be a saint. This amount of money can build any size of refinery in Nigeria but the corrupt people in NNPC will never allow that to happen. We have spent this money subsidizing fuel for other neighboring countries courtesy of fuel smugglers in the north and NLC and their fellow protesters do not see anything wrong with the continued subsidy payment.

    From: george

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • How did these buffoons get to the various positions they now hold?
    1. Did CBN ever inform or advise this dunce called the minister or the rotten "badluck" that bill for fuel subsidy was N1.73 trillion and they continued to use N1.3 to N1.5 trillion to justify removal of the none existent subsidy?
    2. What kind of planning figure or process throws up 35 million liters as against 59million liters daily consumption of fuel and dunce Minister can shamelessly and publicly state that the rogue figure is what has been in use for years? This fool did not think that something is amiss with such a wide discrepancy between planned and actual.
    In my view, all of this people (Ex Presidents, Ministers of Finance, CBN governors, NNPC, PPPRA etc) deserve to be lined up and shot the same way Jerry Rawlings. The Muslims amongst them must be buried with carcasses of PIGS (PORK) and the Christians buried with charms of Sango and Shopona so that even in death and in hell where they belong, they will know no rest whatsoever.

    From: JasV

    Posted: 3 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.