Articles

Buhari, Bloodshed and 2015 Baboons

20 May 2012

Views: 18,422

Font Size: a / A

0101 SK-backpagex.jpg - 0101 SK-backpagex.jpg

Simon Kolawole Live!: Email: simon.kolawole@thisdaylive.com

I have never at any time hidden my soft spot for General Muhammadu Buhari. And I have good reasons. I have never met or interacted with any Nigerian who is more passionate about the progress of Nigeria than Buhari. I can testify that he is genuinely worried about the state of the nation and would love to be given the opportunity to put the nation back on track. “When you analyse our problems, you will come to the conclusion that we have been ruled by leaders who don’t have conscience,” he once told me. What's more, he has been very disciplined in his personal life. You cannot fault his integrity. All attempts to link him to scandals or impropriety have been unsuccessful. There are insinuations and conjectures here and there, but there is yet no substance to any.

Having said this, however, I am also not unaware of his shortcomings and limitations as he seeks to become president of Nigeria. The most common accusation is that he is a religious extremist, having been quoted as saying Muslims should not vote for non-Muslims in the 2003 elections. He has denied the statement but it sticks till this day. He is also described as not very articulate, especially on policy issues. I have heard a few critics (including former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar) say Buhari always abdicates authority. “When he was head of state,” Atiku said, “he was not in charge. When he was PTF chairman, he was not in charge”. The impression is that he stays aloof while his subordinates call the shots. Some critics also use his “dictatorial” records as a military head of state against him.

Even as a Buhari admirer, I have also been bothered about his ability to win elections. Malam Nasir el-Rufai once described him as “unelectable”.  I don’t really know what el-Rufai meant, but I have always worried about the ability of Buhari to gain the support of the critical stakeholders necessary to win elections. As presidential candidate of the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) in 2003 and 2007, most of the party’s governors were working for or with President Olusegun Obasanjo. Buhari did not have the necessary logistical and financial support. We all know the role governors play in mobilisation and logistics. They largely control the electoral machinery down to the ward level because of the enormous resources at their disposal. Without their support, you must be extremely strong to win elections.

In 2011, Buhari tried for the third time and lost yet again. In his own analysis, he lost because the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) colluded with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to rig. In my humble opinion, I would say he lost because of the failed alliance deal between the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and his party, the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC). I am not ruling out rigging, mind you, but rigging apart, how was Buhari going to be president of Nigeria without a strong presence in Southern Nigeria? Buhari is very popular in the core North, no questions about that. He has the unalloyed, unpurchasable support of the majority of the masses. He also had the support of the clerics, who are closer to the masses than the emirs and the political leaders.

A successful alliance with ACN, which has a strong presence in the South-west, would have given the PDP and its candidate, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, a very good run for their money. The moment the alliance talks failed, I told myself: “Game over!” I did not expect Buhari to win the election. Why did the alliance fail? There were many reasons, but I think mistakes were made ab initio. According to ACN insiders, after the initial talks were held and a committee was set up to work out the modalities of the relationship, Buhari went on to enter into an agreement with the Save Nigeria Group to pick his running mate from one of its leaders. ACN chieftains were enraged. What would be their own gain? Politics is about horse-trading. Why would ACN align with CPC if they were not going to produce the candidate or the running mate? CPC, on the other hand, argued that the national leader of ACN, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, wanted to be running mate to Buhari. They felt it was not proper to field a Muslim-Muslim ticket (especially given the public image of Buhari among Christians). We can list a million other reasons why the talks failed. The failure of the alliance meant Buhari’s chances were mightily reduced while Jonathan was the biggest gainer.

What is Buhari’s strategy to become president of Nigeria? To be honest, I cannot really put my finger on it. I know that based on the figures in the voter register, Buhari can become president with the votes of the North—that is if the voters overwhelmingly support him and there is no constitutional requirement for “vote spread” across at least 24 states of the federation. According to INEC figures, the North-west zone, where Buhari comes from, has the highest number of registered voters, which is about 18.9 million. This is more than the combined figure of 15.9 million credited to the South-east and South-south. South-west, where ACN is very strong, has 14.2 million registered voters. An alliance between the core Northern states and South-west would have dealt a fatal blow on the PDP. But it failed.

The CPC real strategy, I guess, was to win the 19 Northern states by a wide margin in the first round. I believe they also calculated that Jonathan would not be able to score the majority of votes in the first round, even if 17 Southern states voted for him. So, without either of them scoring the required 25 per cent in at least 24 states, there would be a run-off. Then Buhari would win the run-off based on the expected large support of Northern voters. This calculation, unfortunately, did not work out as Jonathan won seven states in the North and Buhari could only win 12. Of course, I have always argued that the North has never voted for one candidate since elections started in pre-Independence era and I did not see that happening suddenly. CPC’s permutations were therefore wrong.

As we approach 2015, it is becoming obvious that Buhari wants to run again. That would be his fourth attempt. When he received CPC leaders last week, he said he would make his decision known “soon” whether or not he would run again. To me, that is a clear indication that he is considering giving it “one more and final” shot. This indication would have dented the hopes of el-Rufai, who is also rumoured to be eyeing the CPC presidential ticket in 2015. If Buhari decides to run, he will certainly pick the party’s ticket. El-Rufai, who has a massive following on the social media (facebook and twitter), may have to look at an alternative platform. Indeed, I have heard a lot of people say it would be better for Buhari to support el-Rufai than run again. They argue that el-Rufai is younger, has more national appeal and is more hands-on. That is a different argument altogether.

If Buhari eventually decides to run, I think he has scored another own goal even before kick-off. While I agree completely with him on the need for free and fair elections, his further pronouncement about “dogs and baboons” being soaked in blood is less than acceptable at this critical moment in our nationhood. The need for credible elections is something that can never be overstated (although, unlike many other commentators, I don’t believe it is only the PDP that rigs; from all that I have seen and heard, no party is clean, but it is more sexy to brand the ruling party the only riggers). We need credible elections like oxygen. There are genuine Nigerians out there who want to run for office but who are discouraged by the filthy electoral process. If we don’t clean up the process, we will remain stuck in political underdevelopment. Buhari can never be wrong on this. He needs our support, the support of all Nigerians who mean well.

I am, however, disturbed and disgusted about his reported threat of bloodshed in the event of rigging. We’ve had too much bloodshed in this country in the last one year to contemplate another one. Buhari is a leader, a former head of state, a presidential material any day. But part of leadership qualities is self-control.  If indeed Buhari said it, I think he should just honourably withdraw the statement and apologise. He can make the same point about credible elections without the threat of bloodshed. That’s not cool enough, General.

And Four Other Things...


Salami or No Salami?
Justice Ayo Isa Salami, the suspended President of the Court of Appeal, is in the news again. This time, the National Judicial Council (NJC), which suspended him last year and recommended that President Goodluck Jonathan should retire him, is asking the president to recall him from suspension. He had been suspended for allegedly lying against former CJN Justice Aloysius Katsina-Alu whom he accused of asking him to pervert the course of justice in the 2007 Sokoto State governorship election petition. For failing to apologise as demanded, Salami was suspended. Although NJC reportedly wants him recalled now, Presidency insists no such letter has been received. Can I make a suggestion then? It was NJC that suspended him, so why don’t they recall him since the president has refused to retire him as recommended by them?

Justice and Politics
Still on the Justice Ayo Isa Salami case, any discerning observer would have noticed the pattern of reactions to the reported recommended recall of the suspended President of the Court of Appeal. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is clearly opposed to it. Its stalwarts, namely Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola and Mr. Segun Oni, former governors of Osun and Ekiti respectively, are hell-bent on making sure the judge is not restored to his position. On the other hand, the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) is mounting pressure to make sure the judge returns. Why? For those who may not know, Justice Salami played a key role in unseating Oyinlola and Oni as governors. The PDP sees Salami as an ACN judge who could do more damage in future elections. Their fear, obviously, is that if he returns, ACN would win more states at the courts. My conclusion: do not expect any resolution soon. It is all politics!

Crude Oil Theft
Despite Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s strenuous efforts to play down THISDAY’s report last week about a looming fiscal crisis, the evidence is painting a different picture. The newspaper had reported that with the unabated theft and illegal bunkering going on in the Niger Delta, we were heading for revenue shortfall which, it goes without saying, would impact on the fiscal regime across the federation. After the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) meeting on Friday, it was announced that the country’s revenue had dropped by N100 billion from N726.72 billion in March to N626.17 billion in April. Minister of State for Finance, Dr Yerima Ngama, said the drop was as a result of drop in “domestic crude sales” – whatever that means. The budget benchmark is $72 per barrel while the market price is over $90. Were we not told that excess crude would make up for the shortfall? I believe there is something we are not being told.

The 2015 ‘Doomsday’
In Nigeria, myths always are garnished and promoted to facts.  Up till tomorrow, Nigerians will quote David Mark as saying telephone is not for the poor. But what he said as Minister of Communication was that NITEL would disconnect the lines of its debtors. He said they could not claim that they were too poor to settle their bills. Poor people, he added, didn’t own telephones. The headline the following day was: “Telephone is Not for the Poor – David Mark”. Another popular myth is that the US has predicted Nigeria would break up in 2015. THISDAY published the full report of the “prediction” during the week. One, it was a conference organised by the National Intelligence Council (NIC). Two, NIC disclaimed the views as those of the individual speakers. Three, nowhere was it said or written that Nigeria would break up. Today, Nigerians freely quote the “prediction” by US. Some even say it was CIA that predicted it!

Tags: Backpage, Featured, BLOODSHED

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (2)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Simon
    Thanks for this excellent piece. However I will say something about the PDP because it is the current party of government. Their style of governance is rather too parochial. PDP does not know how to run an inclusive government. They neglect the people that they are meant to serve and turn around to build a pool of billionaires with state treasury. They mouth 'Transformation' while in reality the worst form of graft is going on in government. Even if Buhari keeps quiet, the PDP will run Nigeria aground eventually. No, we don't want bloodshed, but PDP does not care if blood was shed anyway. Otherwise they would have taken the interests of the ordinary people seriously.

    From: Affey

    Posted: 2 years ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Where are we headed, with the kind of politics we play? We need to think critically about the future of our children. Our politicians are very cruel. They must stop these distractions and give us the basic things of life such as electricity and water. Stop politics and face the reality!

    From: kunle

    Posted: 2 years ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus