Articles

Bakassi: FG Keeps Mum over Declaration of Independence

12 Aug 2012

Views: 13,316

Font Size: a / A

271211T.abba-moro.jpg-271211T.abba-moro.jpg

Minister of Interior, Comrade Abba Moro

By Jude Okwe, Senator Iroegbu and Paul Obi

Despite the alleged declaration of independence, hoisting of flag and coat of arms by the Bakassi people in Cross River State, the federal government appears unperturbed, keeping mum over the matter, even as tension and uncertainty appear to have enveloped the state with political leaders engaging in crucial deliberation of the crisis.

When THISDAY contacted the Minister of Information, Labaran Maku, on the federal government’s position on the matter, he was not available for comment.

But the Minister of Interior, Comrade Abba Moro, while speaking with THISDAY in a telephone chat Saturday night, described the Bakassi issue as a thorny and very topical one which has a lot to do with Nigeria’s standing in the international community.

“You are aware of the ICJ ruling that Bakassi is supposed to be ceded to Cameroon. However, there issues that must be considered; the first one is that there has to be a legislation to that effect making it legal and constitutional, which I think as at the moment has not been done. Secondly, there has to be acceptance of the rule by the people of Bakassi Local Government Area to be part of Cameroon. Most importantly, this is a constitutional matter because Bakassi LGA is part of the 774 LGAs in the country and ceding any part of the country has to follow constitutional procedure by legislation.”

In his reaction to the development, Governor Liyel Imoke of Cross River State said his government had briefed the presidency on the development as he appealed to the protesters to be peaceful and law-abiding in pursuing their legitimate rights for justice.

“In the circumstance, it’s only dialogue that can resolve the issues and that is why I’m appealing to my people to give dialogue a chance in the matter as they pursue justice,” he said.

According to Imoke, “the state government has briefed the federal government. The governor, along with members of the National Assembly from the state, has met with Aso Rock and had given their own suggestions on how the matter can be resolved.”

Imoke’s appeal is however coming as the House of Representatives weekend called on President Goodluck Jonathan to appeal the verdict of the ICJ before October 10, when the period allowed for such an appeal will expire, saying if the Nigerian government fails to appeal within the first 10 years allowed, it would be deemed that it has accepted the verdict and would no more question the decision of the World Court any longer.

Making the call in Calabar, members of the House Committee on Treaties and Agreement who were  on  a fact-finding visit to the state advised Jonathan, to as a matter of urgent national interest, appeal the verdict before the expiration of its deadline, saying  Nigeria would have nothing to argue again over Bakassi in future if the advice was not heeded.

Chairman of the committee, Hon. Yacoub Bush Alebiosu, said in an interview that it was necessary that such an appeal be entered to forestall any breakdown of law and order at the peninsula given the declaration of independence by some natives of the territory following Nigerian government’s seeming indifference to their plight.

He explained that though their visit was to afford them the opportunity of first-hand information on the Bakassi issue instead of relying on hear-say, it was necessary that the federal government be told what to do, given that the law allows for appeal of the ICJ judgement within the first 10 years of the verdict.

Alebiosu said with the facts already gathered, the committee will be in a position to make strong recommendations to the House of Representatives on the matter when the National Assembly resumes from recess, adding that Nigeria has signed over 240 Treaties and Agreements so far and that for any to be enforced, it must be domesticated.

A member of the committee, Hon. Ifeoluwa Arowosoge, in his remarks said despite the fact that the House was on recess, the president should still seize the initiative by exploring all the legal options open to Nigeria by appealing the verdict of the ICJ against the self determination of the people of Bakassi before October 10.

He described the ceding of Bakassi as a calamity of a democratic regime, stressing that failure to appeal will automatically mean accepting the unjust judgment of the ICJ on Nigeria but however promised Cross River State that the committee will be on the part of the law for the sovereignty of the country.

THISDAY checks revealed that Bakassi indigenes resorted to the declaration owing to the neglect they have suffered from the federal government.

According a source who pleaded anonymity, “Given the ill-treatment the Bakassi people have received from the federal government, mostly by ceding them to Cameroon, they have the right to self-rule and actualisation.”

Tags: Bakassi, Featured, News, Nigeria

Comments: 0

Rating: 

 (0)

Comments (8)

Read other user's comments about this page. You can add your own comments below.

  • Nigeria! great country, useless people.
    All we know is book, book, and book. plenty theories. queens English....DEAD brains..the first blunder was subjecting Nigeria to the ICJ. there are loads of Icj ruling on France, America, United kingdom etc, they never obeyed any.. that shows its insignificance. what is that island in Argentina called again? Falkland (?) has Britain hands off that place? Argentina had asked the issue be resolved @ the ICJ ever since but Britain had always objected. why? they know that place belongs to Argentina.. put the legal team in world together, they cant convince or confuse even the dumbest of judges.

    But, what did we(our intellectually hollowed leaders) do? they had document prepared by the Germans way back showing the place belong to Cameroon but still went to the ICJ.. stupid thing to do. they had better appeal that nonsense judgement. Its a bad case already. I don't know what new fact and evidence they are going to be tendering before them.

    but for the love of God, what is wrong with us? how come nothing works here?
    Lord have mercy on the helpless masses...

    From: Saad Concern

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Nigeria! great country, useless people.
    All we know is book, book, and book. plenty theories. queens English....DEAD brains..the first blunder was subjecting Nigeria to the ICJ. there are loads of Icj ruling on France, America, United kingdom etc, they never obeyed any.. that shows its insignificance. what is that island in Argentina called again? Falkland (?) has Britain hands off that place? Argentina had asked the issue be resolved @ the ICJ ever since but Britain had always objected. why? they know that place belongs to Argentina.. put the legal team in world together, they cant convince or confuse even the dumbest of judges.

    But, what did we(our intellectually hollowed leaders) do? they had document prepared by the Germans way back showing the place belong to Cameroon but still went to the ICJ.. stupid thing to do. they had better appeal that nonsense judgement. Its a bad case already. I don't know what new fact and evidence they are going to be tendering before them.

    but for the love of God, what is wrong with us? how come nothing works here?
    Lord have mercy on the helpless masses...

    From: Saad Concern

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Bravo Bakassi people no amount of silent should deter you keep on and to you Camerounian keep off the new state. you shall stand and succeed .

    From: Jasp J

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • This is a very delicate issue as it is right now, following the ICJ judgement on Bakkassi Penninsula and its people being ceded to Cameroun, Nigeria as a country may not have the right to annex Bakassi as a sovereign nation following their declaration of Independence. On the other hand, Cameroun may want to run them over and annex them as part of their country which may appear prudent based on ICJ judgement. The question now is, Will Nigeria allow Cameroun to easily overrun an Independent Bakassi, a neighboring country that was once a part of them and may in the future have a bilateral relationship with them and above all speak the same language and have a common
    culture? As the events unfold let us thread carefully.

    From: Bobby Chukwuma

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • Where is Obasanjo?those so-called evil states men who only become relevant in mortgaging the very interest they swore by oats to keep.If it is killing civilians at Odi,or Zakibiam,you will see them mobilising soldiars and police men to destroy/kill those without knife or gun.Just like all of them turn generals in Nigerian army for killing Igbos in quantity.He has every power and right to address Bakassi issues to comclusion.Tomorrow UNO will send him to Congo to make peace while his house is on fire.Charity do not begin at home for them,it begins abroad,Shame on them!

    From: Tagbo

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • I think it's an impediment for nigeria to allow her part be taken by other nation

    From: ABOH

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • In most cases when there is a ruling on a case for the first time, provision is made for appeal. I thank God that Bakasi case's is not different. Considering the gravity of this injustice, the Federal Government should speedily exploit this provision of appeal. Before the appeal, every detail of the the ruling should be scrupulously looked into. Bakasi is Nigeria. In Nigeria will they remain. And if by any means they are not accepted, they will never refuse themselves. Bakasi lives!

    From: Alphons Chijioke

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

  • I HOPE NIGERIA ARMY SHOULD DEFENDS THE BAKASSI WITH ANY NECESSARY MEANS AS NEWLY INDEPENDENCE STATES OR NEWLY IS SISTER STATE, THEY CAN NOT WATCH AND SEE PRACTICES THEY SHOULD STANDS UP AND SUPPORT THE PEOPLE IS RIGHT. LET OBASANJO BEING ROPE AND ASKS HOW MUCH WAS THE DEEDS HE ILLEGALLY CORRECTED AND WHY THE NATIONAL INTERESTS WERE NOT PROTECTED ?

    From: JIMMY

    Posted: 9 months ago

    Flag as inappropriate

Add your comment

Please leave your comment below. Your name will appear next to your comment. We'll also keep you updated by email whenever someone else comments on this page. Your comment will appear on this page once it has been approved by a moderator.

comments powered by Disqus